Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Exploring the belief systems of senior managers Antecedents of managerial discretion

By Robert Galavan


Upper-echelons theory has been an extremely active stream of research for over two-decades and, as a counterbalance to the population ecology perspective, has provided evidence to support the position that managers influence firm outcomes. Upper-echelons theory posits that, as managers are boundedly rational and selectively perceptive, a behavioural component derived from their idiosyncratic characteristics should be evident in organisation outcomes. While extensive research has found support for these posited relationships, the operationalisation process subsumes the presumed micro psychological processes into a black-box. Adopting a realist perspective, this thesis goes beyond accepting that organisational outcomes are shaped by managers characteristics and explores the underlying generative mechanisms at work. While upper-echelons theory presumes that a process of selective perception explains the black-box processes, in the two-decades since its publication it has received little empirical attention. In this light, the selective perception literature is extensively reviewed, ultimately rejected, and an alternative model developed. Over time, both strategic choice and population ecology theorists have moved from their extreme positions of opposition and a theory of managerial discretion has been proposed to bridge the divide. This thesis builds and extends the concept of managerial discretion as an alternative framework to explain the black-box processes of upper-echelons theory. The theoretical model developed, proposes how, through the process of perceived, enacted, and actual discretion, managers characteristics shape outcomes. The model provides an extensive base for future research and this thesis tests the initial stage, exploring the relationship between managerial characteristics and perceived discretion

Publisher: School of Management
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion. doi
  2. (1956). Barriers to New Competition, doi
  3. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. doi
  4. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. doi
  5. (2004). International activities in small firms: Examining factors influencing the internationalization and export growth of small firms. doi
  6. (1998). International market selection: A cognitive mapping perspective. doi
  7. (1971). Law and explanation: An essay in the philosophy of science, doi
  8. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. doi
  9. (1936). Mind in everyday affairs: An examination into logical and non-logical thought process.
  10. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning,
  11. (1957). Personality and organization: The conflict between the system and the individual , doi
  12. (1987). Reflections on the essays. In: Feiwel, G., (Ed.) Arrow and the foundations of the theory of economic policy, doi
  13. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites, doi
  14. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review May-June,
  15. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.