Location of Repository

The Influence of Frequency and Semantic Similarity on How Children Learn Grammar

By Kirsten Abbot-Smith and Michael Tomasello


Lexically based learning and semantic analogy may both play a role in the learning of\ud grammar. To investigate this, 5-year-old German children were trained on a miniature\ud language (nominally English) involving two grammatical constructions, each of which was\ud associated with a different semantic verb class. Training was followed by elicited production\ud and grammaticality judgement tests with ‘trained verbs’ and a ‘generalization’ test, involving\ud untrained verbs. In the ‘trained verbs’ judgement test the children were above chance at\ud associating particular verbs with the constructions in which they had heard them. They\ud did this significantly more often with verbs which they had heard especially frequently in\ud particular constructions, indicating lexically based learning. There was also an interaction\ud between frequency and semantic class (or the particular verbs). In the generalization\ud judgement test the children were at chance overall. In the elicited production generalization\ud test 75% of the children used the same construction for all items

Topics: H1, BF
Publisher: Sage
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:25339

Suggested articles



  1. (2000). A dynamic usage-based doi
  2. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. doi
  3. (2002). Attention to novel objects during verb learning. doi
  4. (1990). Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure? doi
  5. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. doi
  6. (2003). Constructions, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In doi
  7. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. doi
  8. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. doi
  9. (2001). Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. doi
  10. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. doi
  11. (2008). Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. doi
  12. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. doi
  13. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. doi
  14. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss. Cambridge: doi
  15. (1990). Language development and individual differences: A study of auxiliary verb learning. Cambridge: doi
  16. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of verb-argument structure. doi
  17. (2008). Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In doi
  18. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. doi
  19. (2009). Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child-directed speech. doi
  20. (2010). Lib/The Librarian on
  21. (2005). Mapping novel nouns and verbs onto dynamic action events: Are verb meanings easier to learn than noun meanings for Japanese children? doi
  22. (1990). Miniature language system acquisition by children with different learning proficiencies. doi
  23. (1983). Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults. doi
  24. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. doi
  25. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. doi
  26. (1989). Prefabs, patterns and rules in interaction? Formulaic speech in adult learners’ L2 Swedish. In doi
  27. (2005). Regularising unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. doi
  28. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. doi
  29. (1986). Semantic reference and phrasal grouping in the acquisition of a miniature phrase structure language. doi
  30. (2001). Sprachentwicklungstest für drei- bis fünfjährige Kinder. doi
  31. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. doi
  32. (2005). Testing the role of semantic similarity in syntactic development. doi
  33. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language.
  34. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgments of argumentstructure overgeneralization errors. doi
  35. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In doi
  36. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. doi
  37. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello doi
  38. (2004). The role of entrenchment in constraining children’s verb argument structure overgeneralisations: A grammaticality judgment study.
  39. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. doi
  40. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. doi
  41. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. doi
  42. (2004). Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: The role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. doi
  43. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. doi
  44. (2006). When is a grasp a grasp? Characterizing some basic components of human action processing. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford: doi
  45. (2007). When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs. doi
  46. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.