Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

By Nicolae Nistor, Thomas Lerche, Armin Weinberger, Ciprian Ceobanu and Jan Oliver Heymann


Educational technology is increasingly used in multicultural contexts and across national cultures. Educational technology users with different national and professional backgrounds may, however, exhibit different attitudes towards technology. Previous research provides isolated evidence of the relationship between learning technology acceptance and culture, and so an overall picture is missing. Therefore, this study attempts to integrate culture (sensu Hofstede, 2001) into an established technology acceptance model (ie. the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT, Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis, 2003). Examining a large sample (N = 2866) of learning technology users from Germany and Romania by means of questionnaire survey, we investigate the differences in culture and technology acceptance between sample subgroups. The collected data reveal the presence of cultural differences both between countries and between professions. In line with previous research, these differences are associated with dissimilar acceptance profiles, ie. different values of acceptance variables and of path coefficients between them. Based on the findings, this study makes headway in cross-cultural research by proposing an extended model of UTAUT – one which integrates three of Hofstede’s culture dimensions. As a practical implication, national and professional culture may shape computer-based learning environments.

Topics: Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie, ddc:150, ddc:370
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01383.x
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Open Access LMU

Suggested articles


  1. (2010). A comparative study of individual acceptance of instant messaging in the US and China: A structural equation modeling approach.
  2. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).
  3. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict.
  4. (2010). An alternative to methodological individualism: A nonreductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups.
  5. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behaviour relation: Reasoned and automatic processes.
  6. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
  7. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.
  8. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks,
  9. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
  10. (2007). Information technology acceptance across cultures. In
  11. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
  12. (2012). Teachers’ acceptance and use of an educational portal.
  13. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture.
  14. (2008). The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies.
  15. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-learning implementation: a comparative study of an Argentinean and a Swedish university.
  16. (2010). The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use.
  17. (2009). The role of national culture in social networking adoption.
  18. (2010). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology:
  19. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.
  20. (2011). Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to interpret cross-cultural blended teaching and learning.
  21. (2012). VSM 94. Retrieved online 04/13/2012 at: /vsm-94

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.