Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning

By Armin Weinberger, Bernhard Ertl, Frank Fischer and Heinz Mandl


Collaborative learning in computer-supported learning environments typically means that learners work on tasks together, discussing their individual perspectives via text-based media or videoconferencing, and consequently acquire knowledge. Collaborative learning, however, is often sub-optimal with respect to how learners work on the concepts that are supposed to be learned and how learners interact with each other. One possibility to improve collaborative learning environments is to conceptualize epistemic scripts, which specify how learners work on a given task, and social scripts, which structure how learners interact with each other. In this contribution, two studies will be reported that investigated the effects of epistemic and social scripts in a text-based computer-supported learning environment and in a videoconferencing learning environment in order to foster the individual acquisition of knowledge. In each study the factors ‘epistemic script’ and ‘social script’ have been independently varied in a 2×2-factorial design. 182 university students of Educational Science participated in these two studies. Results of both studies show that social scripts can be substantially beneficial with respect to the individual acquisition of knowledge, whereas epistemic scripts apparently do not to lead to the expected effects.

Topics: Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie, ddc:150, ddc:370
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Open Access LMU

Suggested articles


  1. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.
  2. Analysis and facilitation in computer supported collaborative scenarios]. Professorial dissertation,
  3. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.
  4. (1996). Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instruction. In
  5. (2003). Computer mediated knowledge communication. Special Issue:
  6. (1996). Computer support for knowledge building communities. In
  7. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition.
  8. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups.
  9. (2003). Cooperation scripts for computer supported collaborative learning. In
  10. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs.
  11. (2003). Designing Effective Science Inquiry in Text Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments.
  12. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school.
  13. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher guided discussions.
  14. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning.
  15. (1985). Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transfer.
  16. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing.
  17. (2002). Enhancing the quality of online discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,
  18. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In
  19. (2001). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion. Analyse und Förderung in computerunterstützten Kooperationsszenarien [Collaborative knowledge construction.
  20. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition.
  21. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain.
  22. (1997). Interfacedesign für computerunterstütztes kooperatives Lernen [Interface design for computer supported cooperative learning]. In
  23. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In
  24. (1932). Moral judgment of the child.
  25. (2002). Over scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In
  26. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade.
  27. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information.
  28. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment.
  29. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In
  30. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks.
  31. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice.
  32. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups.
  33. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In
  34. (2003). Scripts for computer supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction.
  35. (1998). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen mit Tele Tutoring [Selfguided learning with tele tutoring].
  36. (2001). Simulated Computer Mediated / Video Interactive Distance Learning:
  37. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In
  38. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation.
  39. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation in computer supported collaborative learning].
  40. (1990). System and metasystem in cognitive operations. In
  41. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In
  42. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction.
  43. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to.
  44. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.