This paper asks a series of very direct, if not simple, questions. How and why is it that\ud we assume that modern knowledge is universal, despite its European genealogy and its\ud historically recent provenance? What warrant do we have for considering this superior\ud to the pre-modern knowledges of the West, and the autochthonous knowledges of the\ud non-West? Are we, in short, right to assume that modern Western knowledge transcends\ud the circumstances of its historical and geographical emergence and thus that the social\ud sciences are ‘true’ for everyone- even though to do so is to privilege the modern and the\ud western, over the pre-modern and the non-Western
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.