Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Relationship Between Personality Characteristics and Acceptance of Minority Influence

By Ryan M. Nicholls

Abstract

According to the literature on social influence, there is a strong relationship between exposure to minority points of view and divergent thinking (i.e., thinking characterized as fluid, flexible, and more creative). Relatedly, another body of research has established a link between creativity and certain personality characteristics, especially those that contain novelty or originality as key components (e.g., openness to experience, need for cognition). In the present study, we examined the possibility that entertaining and accepting minority points of view might be, in part, related to a variety of personality characteristics. Specifically, we predicted that individuals who score high in need for cognition and openness to experience would be more influenced by a minority source of influence than would individuals who scored relatively lower on these two measures. That is, we imagined that individuals high in openness and need for cognition might be more inclined to construe the minority source of influence as a source of creative thinking and therefore gravitate toward the point of view expressed by the minority. In addition to measuring the above mentioned personality variables, we manipulated source status (minority/ majority) and the general success of the position being argued (successful/ unsuccessful). These variables were manipulated within a brief vignette read by all participants. In this vignette the source argued in favor of a policy that would require all college students to complete 4 semesters of foreign language training in the interest of making them more marketable in the global economy. Source status was manipulated by including the percentage of individuals who agreed with the new policy (i.e., 85% agreed for majority, 15% agreed for minority), and success of the position being argued was manipulated by providing information regarding the success of the foreign language policy when adopted by a distant university. Thus, the study utilized a 2 (Status: Minority/Majority) X 2 (Success: Success/Failure) X 2 (Personality Variable (Need for Cognition and Openness to Experience: High/Low) factorial design. The dependent variables of interest included both direct (i.e., overall acceptance of minority influence) and indirect (i.e., divergent thinking) measures. Our results support the notion that personality characteristics are related to the extent to which a minority point of view is entertained. The results indicate that individuals who were high in openness in the minority condition, were more likely to accept the proposal if it was deemed successful versus unsuccessful. However, we also found that individuals low in openness, in either status condition, were more likely to accept the foreign language proposal if it was previously deemed unsuccessful versus successful, and the same held true for those individuals who were high in openness and in the majority condition. We also found a 3-way interaction for need for cognition yielding similar results. This is a curious result that does not coincide with the existing literature. Thus, future studies should look at the relationship between individual personality characteristics and acceptance of minority influence in both successful and unsuccessful contexts

Topics: Psychology
Publisher: ScholarWorks@GVSU
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:scholarworks.gvsu.edu:mcnair-1306
Provided by: Scholarworks@GVSU

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several fivefactor models. In
  2. (1994). A content, correlational and facor analytic study of four tolerance ambiguity questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, doi
  3. (2008). Adding minority status to a source of conflict: An examination of influence processes and product quality in dyads. doi
  4. (2000). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups discussing the death penalty: A shared representations interpretation. doi
  5. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. doi
  6. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In doi
  7. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence. doi
  8. (2007). Creative types and personality. doi
  9. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical Study. doi
  10. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. doi
  11. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. doi
  12. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. doi
  13. (2010). Direct and indirect minority influence in groups. In
  14. (2006). Divergence vs. ambivalence: Effects of personal relevance on minority influence. doi
  15. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments.
  16. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. doi
  17. (1996). Focus versus flexibility majority and minority influence can both improve performance. doi
  18. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. doi
  19. (1981). Human groups and social categories. doi
  20. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. doi
  21. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of crativity. doi
  22. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. doi
  23. (1992). Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance. doi
  24. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: Seizing and freezing. doi
  25. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. doi
  26. (1999). Motives and modes of processing in the social influence of groups.
  27. (1993). Numerical support, information processing and attitude change. doi
  28. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects impressional primacy. doi
  29. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. doi
  30. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. doi
  31. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. doi
  32. (1996). Social consequences of experimental openness. doi
  33. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. doi
  34. (2003). The effects of solution elicitation aids and need for cognition on the generation of solutions to ill-structured problems. doi
  35. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. doi
  36. (1993). The MSAT-I: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. doi
  37. (1982). The need for cognition. doi
  38. (2008). The phenomenology of minority-majority status: Effects on innovation in argument generation. doi
  39. (1935). The psychology of social norms. doi
  40. (1956). The structure of intellect. doi
  41. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurements and applications. doi
  42. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. doi
  43. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgemmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, doi
  44. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.