University of Bangka Belitung Repository

Dr. Ibrahim, M.Si., -

The Extractive Industries and SocietyAwarded since June 2021 (3 reviews)presented toIBRAHIM IBRAHIMin recognition of the review contributed to the journalThe Editors of The Extractive Industries and Society7/21/22, 3:18 PM My peer reviews | Publonshttps://publons.com/wos-op/dashboard/records/review/ 1/3Private dashboard - My peer reviewsFor Ibrahim IbrahimWeb of Science ResearcherID   R-4368-2019Dashboard summaryPublic profileExport Publons CVCitation mapPublicationsEditor recordsPending recordsNotificationsWeb of ScienceAcademyScored publicationsMeMy recordsPeer reviewsActivityCommunityADD A REVIEWAdd or load a review using the button above, edit existing reviews by clicking in the Edit column, or add value toexisting reviews by clicking in the Progress column. Read more about adding reviews here .FILTER REVIEWSHIDE FILTERS CLEAR ALLJournals Journal research field (ESI)Verified Publicly displayedWith content Post-publicationDURING PERIODtoStart EndWeb of Science Core Collection onlyPeer Review Grant Review NEWBig news! Your Publons™ profile is moving to the Web of Science™. Click here to read more. ×BROWSE COMMUNITY FAQSWEB OFSCIENCEPrivate Dashboard Review Records7/21/22, 3:18 PM My peer reviews | Publonshttps://publons.com/wos-op/dashboard/records/review/ 2/3Showing 2 reviews of 2 manuscripts2022-07-16 How Does the Local Communi... Journal of Regional a...     - -2021-01-27 Deradicalization through Revi... Journal of Social Sci...     - -No more results.Scored publicationsJournalsResearcherID badgeAccountProfileAffiliationsEmailPermissionsSettingsFILTER MANUSCRIPTSScored PublishedContactSend QuestionsSend ReviewsClarivate blogNavigateResearchersCOVID-19 indexPublicationsJournalsAbout usOur MissionIn the PressLogosTerms, Policies & GuidelinesPROGRESS EDIT CITATIONS ALTMETRICDATE ▼ MANUSCRIPT JOURNAL

SERIFIKAT REVIEWER

Dr. Eddy Nurtjahya, M.Sc., -

    REVIEWER CERTIFICATE  This certificate is awarded to EDDY NURTJAHYA  For serving as a reviewer for LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT   Thank you for reviewing 2 Manuscripts in 2020  24 February 2021     Vanessa Wong Date Editor-in-Chief se-2017-72 (referee) - manuscript publishedFrom: editorial@copernicus.orgTo: eddy_nurtjahya@yahoo.comDate: Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 18:29 GMT+7Dear Eddy Nurtjahya,We are pleased to inform you that the following manuscript has been published in Solid Earth:Revegetation in abandoned quarries with landfill stabilized waste and gravels: water dynamics and plant growth – acase studyAuthor(s): Cheng-liang Zhang et al.MS No.: se-2017-72MS Type: Research articleIt is available for download at: https://www.solid-earth.net/8/1131/2017/In addition please find all Referee and Topical Editor reports, the author's response, as well as the differentmanuscript versions of the peer-review completion (post-discussion review of revised submission) at:https://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/se-2017-72/#discussionWe would like to take this opportunity to thank you again for your support and look forward to future cooperation.Kind regards,Natascha TöpferCopernicus PublicationsEditorial Supporteditorial@copernicus.orgon behalf of the SE Editorial BoardRevegetation in abandoned quarries with land ll stabilized waste and gravels: water dynamics and plant growth –a case studyCheng-liang Zhang, Jing-jing Feng, Li-ming Rong, and Ting-ning ZhaoDownloadFinal revised paper (published on 02 Nov 2017)Supplement to the  nal revised paperPreprint (discussion started on 21 Jul 2017)https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-1131-2017© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Article Peer review Metrics Related articlesResearch article |  | 02 Nov 2017■■■Interactive discussionStatus: closedAC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment - Printer-friendly version   - SupplementAC3: 'Response to A. Cerdà', Tingning Zhao, 02 Sep 2017 AC2: 'Response to Referee #1', Tingning Zhao, 01 Sep 2017 RC4: 'Good luck', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Sep 2017 AC4: 'Response to Referee #2', Tingning Zhao, 04 Sep 2017 RC3: 'Last minor things', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Sep 2017 AC1: 'Response to Referee #2', Tingning Zhao, 01 Sep 2017 SC1: 'lack of information about the relationship of soil and vegetation', Artemi Cerdà, 26 Jul 2017 SC2: 'lack of information about the relationship of soil and vegetation', Artemi Cerdà, 26 Jul 2017 RC1: 'Suggestions', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Aug 2017 RC2: 'Comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Aug 2017 Peer-review completionAR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decisionAR by Tingning Zhao on behalf of the Authors (12 Sep 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript ED: Publish as is (24 Sep 2017) by Antonio Jordán ED: Publish as is (24 Sep 2017) by Antonio Jordán(Executive editor) AR by Tingning Zhao on behalf of the Authors (26 Sep 2017)Revegetation in abandoned quarries with land ll stabilized waste and gravels: water dynamics and plant growth –a case studyCheng-liang Zhang, Jing-jing Feng, Li-ming Rong, and Ting-ning ZhaoAbstract. Large amounts of quarry wastes are produced during quarrying. Though quarry wastes are commonly used in pavement construction and concrete production, insitu utilization during ecological restoration of abandoned quarries has the advantage of simplicity. In this paper, rock fragments 2–3 cm in size were mixed with land llstabilized waste (LSW) in di erent proportions (LSW : gravel, R ), which was called LGM. The water content, runo  and plant growth under natural precipitation weremonitored for 2 years using a runo  plot experiment. LGM with a low fraction of LSW was compacted to di erent degrees to achieve an appropriate porosity; waterdynamics and plant growth of compacted LGM were studied in a  eld experiment. The results showed the following: (1) LGM can be used during restoration in abandonedquarries as growing material for plants. (2) R  had a signi cant e ect on the in ltration and water-holding capacity of LGM and thus in uenced the retention of precipitation,water condition and plant growth. LGM with R  ranging from 8:1 to 3:7 was suitable for plant growth, and the target species grew best when R  was 5:5. (3) Compactionsigni cantly enhanced water content of LGM with a low R  of 2:8, but leaf water content of plants was lower or unchanged in the more compacted plots. Moderatecompaction was bene cial to the survival and growth of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco and Medicago sativa L. were not signi cantly a ected bycompaction, and they grew better under a high degree of compaction, which was disadvantageous for the uppermost layer of vegetation.How to cite. Zhang, C.-L., Feng, J.-J., Rong, L.-M., and Zhao, T.-N.: Revegetation in abandoned quarries with land ll stabilized waste and gravels: water dynamics and plantgrowth – a case study, Solid Earth, 8, 1131–1139, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-1131-2017, 2017.Received: 10 Jul 2017 – Discussion started: 21 Jul 2017 – Revised: 12 Sep 2017 – Accepted: 24 Sep 2017 – Published: 02 Nov 2017https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-1131-2017© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Article Peer review Metrics Related articlesResearch article |  | 02 Nov 2017LLL LLArticle (2106 KB)Supplement (149 KB)BibTeXEndNoteDownload & linksShareThe SE editorial board, the European Geosciences Union, and Copernicus Publications thank the following colleagues very much for their work in reviewing the manuscriptspublished in the journal volume 8, 2017.Evgeny AbakumovSte en AbeP C AbhilashMichael AfanasievBjarne AlmqvistAndrew AplinFabio ArzilliCarlos M. Asensio GrimaTayfun AşkınValentina R. BarlettaPeter BarryOğuz BaşkanAntoine BezosAndrea BistacchiIgor BogunovicClare BondEdson BortoluzziRémy BossuSeth BurgessLaurent CANERFlaminia CatalliGuillaume CaumonIna CecićArtemi CerdàYizhao ChenZhiqiang ChenGiovanni Chiodinichengjin chuMichele CookePatrick CordierEdoardo CostantiniValerio de RubeisZeng DehuiMarta Della SetaGuillaume DesboisAlexandre DimanovJoseph DoetschGeorg DresenOlusegun EkanadeMark EverettManuele FaccendaLuigi FerrantiKen FerrierSebastien GacF. GaladiniChengcheng GangPetar GlisovicGabriel GodefroyWerner GraesleBernhard GrasemannIlknur GümüşLars HansenKo HashizumeGraham HeinsonTobias HergertGregor HillersTakehiko HiragaT. HondohPaloma Hueso GonzálezMatt IkariThomas IserlohPramod JhaY. JiangTim JohnsonScott JohnsonAntonio JordánAndreas JungeBoris KausRuth KepplerYones KhaledianGeo rey KimbellMatt KingAlexander KoptevGautier LaurentJean-Luc Le PennecMorgane LedevinPengfei LiYue LiJianlong LiRichard LisleRonggao LiuLijun LiuJulian Lowmanmiaojun maAysha Masood KhanLuca MenegonTheresa MercerAlessandro Maria MichettiHarald MilschTegegne MollaCristian MontanaroLaurent MontesiLuiz F. G. MoralesAurélien MordretJed MosenfelderThomas MuellerGuust NoletAgata NovaraAndy NowackiEddy NurtjahyaMarc Olivavalerio olivettiBeata Orlecka-SikoraHugo OrtnerTASKIN OZTASFernando PachecoYakov PachepskyMehmet ParlakSheng PengGiorgio PennacchioniPaulo PereiraLucia Perez-DiazPiero PoliRob PorrittDavid PriorJacques PrécigoutAnthony PurcellNicholas RawlinsonKarsten ReiterUwe RingJesús Rodrigo-CominoAnna RogowitzTobias RolfYuping RongAtle RotevatnJörg SchallerThomas ScheiberMark SchmitzErland SchulsonHuseyin SENOLZhihua ShiArvind SinghWim SpakmanHolger Ste enHolger StunitzZhengguo SunPaul TackleyEncarnación TaguasPetra TalbergJoshua TaronMartin ThorwartPing TongGergely TothClaudia TrepmannAnna TsibartPanagiotis TsourlosBulent TurgutXavier UbedaManolis VeveakisAntónio VieiraGiulio ViolaFabian WadsworthRuzhen WangJun WangJérôme WassermannFlorian WellmannMelanie WeynantsJoseph Clancy WhiteGuangliang WuZhongbao XinErqi XuRiccardo ZaccarelliNatalia ZakharovaMing ZhangShijie ZhongGökhan ÇayciEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment: Decision on "Effect on soil characteristics dueto land reclamation and coal mining activities with an emphasis on the involvement ofcoal: a review"From: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (do-not-reply@springernature.com)To: eddy_nurtjahya@yahoo.comDate: Thursday, 18 May 2023 at 20:45 GMT+7Dear Dr Nurtjahya,Thank you for your help with the manuscript, "Effect on soil characteristics due to land reclamation and coal miningactivities with an emphasis on the involvement of coal: a review", which you recently reviewed for EnvironmentalMonitoring and Assessment.For your records, the decision on this manuscript, based partly on your input, was: Reject. Any comments to authorshave been appended below.We greatly appreciate your assistance and participation in the review process for Environmental Monitoring andAssessment and hope that we can continue to benefit from your expertise on future submissions.Kind regards,Editorial AssistantEnvironmental Monitoring and AssessmentReviewer 1The manuscript is a Review that is concerned with the impact of coal mining activities on the soil and the effect ofland reclamation on the soil. The subject fits into the scope of the Journal: Environmental Monitoring andAssessment, and could in principle be interesting for the public concerned with the effort to restore coal-mined soils.To present more balance in the effect of reclamation on the coal-mined soil, the authors should addressproportionately physical, chemical, and biological properties. The biological properties (16 lines) are the leastcompared to the other subheadings: physical (57 lines), chemical (70 lines), and heavy metals (67 lines).Besides microbial activities, the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and microfauna, which are already mentionedin the manuscript, more detailed information should be added, such as the concentration, the density, and thespecies. The role of mesofauna is also important in the early phase of decomposition. Addressing the plant species,the plant habit used, and the planting techniques are important in the revegetation discussion. Numbers, groups /taxon of biota, or plant species are important to mention and then easily to compare between the impact of miningand the effect of reclamation.The overall information given by the authors is relatively detailed, comparing the effect of coal mining activities onthe soil and the effect of revegetation on the mined soil. But, it would be easier for the reader to digest if thecomparison data is summarized and presented in a table. Then the conclusion may be more focused. The tables arecompleted with some age of reclamation, which is important information to the readers, but it would be moremeaningful if more information on the age of reclamation is also more explicitly discussed in the body of themanuscript.A conclusion may be more robust by extracting the comparison table above. And therefore, the abstract may then besharpened to present the two main focuses of the manuscript, i.e. the impact of coal mining activities, and the effectof reclamation on the mined soils.In the references, two cited references in the body are not found in the References List.Depending on the data, this review may suggest Standard criteria for the land damage impact of mining activitiesand Standard criteria for the revegetation success of coal-mined soil.Attachments:• https://reviewer-feedback.springernature.com/download/attachment/d3086d71-2768-4e5e-acd3-0153960e459f• https://reviewer-feedback.springernature.com/download/attachment/3b854114-7d90-4a9d-98fa-99a3af668c72• https://reviewer-feedback.springernature.com/download/attachment/1b3c575d-56c9-467d-b8c4-6c4e5730971eReviewer 2Attachments:• https://reviewer-feedback.springernature.com/download/attachment/5abf82e1-e42e-494c-a867-1c539b0524caReviewer 3Your work requires some revisions. Kindly do the needful in the text shared by the Editor

Not a member yet

SERIFIKAT REVIEWER

Sertifikat Reviewer

Modul praktikum produksi dan manajemen pakan ikan

3,567

7,753