bepress Legal Repository
Not a member yet
    611890 research outputs found

    Civil Procedure II with Memo

    No full text

    Criminal Procedure Law & Process

    No full text

    Faculty Forum: June 2024

    No full text

    Torts with memo, comments, best exams

    No full text

    Matter of 559 W. 156 BCR LLC v. NYS Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal

    No full text
    A tenant in a rent-controlled apartment claimed her landlord wrongfully denied her renewal lease. The tenant\u27s parents previously agreed to vacate their rent-controlled unit for another apartment with financial incentives, but the court ruled the agreement invalid due to lack of evidence about informed consent and DHCR approval. On appeal, the landlord argued further fact-finding was impossible with deceased parents, but the court disagreed and remanded the case back to DHCR for a more thorough investigation of the circumstances surrounding the parents\u27 surrender of their rent-controlled apartment. Key Legal Points:Tenants in rent-controlled apartments have strong protections against eviction and non-renewal of leases. Agreements to vacate rent-controlled units can be invalid if tenants are not properly informed about their rights or the agreement isn\u27t approved by DHCR. Courts can remand cases back to administrative agencies for further fact-finding if the initial investigation was insufficient

    Reverse Engineering of Jury Instructions

    No full text

    Just What the Doctor Ordered: The Need for Cross-Cultural Education in Law Schools

    No full text

    Birthright Citizenship in the Empire: Chinese-Filipino Intimacies and Race-making in U.S. Colonial Philippines, 1912-1947

    No full text
    https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/clark_speakers/1103/thumbnail.jp

    Race-Blind Redistricting Algorithms

    No full text
    Litigants increasingly use algorithmic evidence in redistricting cases, employing a collection of algorithmically generated plans to point out the outlier status of the state’s current plan. But with the Supreme Court’s declaration of a race-blind Equal Protection Clause in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the constitutionality of these methods as used in racial gerrymandering cases remains uncertain. Other scholars have examined the potential impacts of race blindness as an algorithmic constraint. This Note instead interrogates the practical possibility of race-blind redistricting algorithms and finds the promise of blindness illusory. Rather, requirements to limit racial inputs in redistricting algorithms fail to create race-neutral outcomes under any of the exclusionary methods examined within

    2,066

    full texts

    611,890

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    bepress Legal Repository is based in United States
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇