Kobe City University of Foreign Studies Institutional Repository

神戸市外国語大学博士（文学）doctoral thesi

上田　美和

PhD thesis defense report  Name of PhD candidate 上田美和 (Miwa Ueda) Title of thesis Learner Autonomy in Elementary School English Classroom: Japanese and Dutch Teachers’ Perceptions Director and members of evaluating committee Montserrat Sanz Lori Zenuk-Nishide Donna Tatsuki Stephen Brown (Konan Women’s University) Date January 30th, 2024. 10:00-12:00. Classroom 502.  Summary of the thesis Learner autonomy (leading to global human resources) is, according to MEXT, a key goal of education. According to the Ministry, this involves self-direction and responsibility. Implementing abstract goals of this kind in the classroom is a complex matter since the concept of autonomy means different things for different teachers.   At the same time, English proficiency among students in Japan is far from the goals set by the government: out of 111 countries ranked, Japan occupied the 80th position. The first position of that ranking is occupied by The Netherlands. Differences in language proximity and in when English was adopted as part of the official curriculum in primary education are a fact, but the author of this thesis explores another factor: the perception of teachers about what learner autonomy means and how it can be implemented in the classroom to address the goal of students achieving proficiency (which is the same for the education authorities of both countries). For this, both a quantitative (a teacher survey) and a qualitative (interviews) study were conducted among Japanese and Dutch teachers. The questions were aimed at finding out: 1) the perceptions of teachers about learner autonomy; 2) the ways in which they work or advise to work to provide better support for the development of learner autonomy; 3) the obstacles and cultural factors that impede the development of learner autonomy.  The results of the thorough analyses of the data provided in this dissertation indicate that:  1. Japanese and Dutch elementary teachers perceive the same categories of learner autonomy (i.e., freedom of choice, self-insight, self-expression, problem-solving, curiosity, and independence), although significant differences were found between the two countries. Japanese teachers emphasized that freedom of choice and self-insight were important, while Dutch teachers emphasized students’ responsibility in learning because being independent learners is important.  2. Japanese and Dutch teachers are already implementing those aspects of teacher support in their English lessons. However, while Japanese teachers emphasized their preference for English-only classes, the Dutch teachers focused on the need for parents’ support in learning at home (in the Netherlands, some English classes are already taught in English).  3. Teachers from both countries want to incorporate freedom of choice by having students set their own goals and create study plans.  4. Teachers in both countries face difficulties such as insufficient teaching skills (resulting in teacher-dependent or textbook-dependent classes) or teaching all English levels of students at once. This is attributed to a shortage of teachers and to too few English classes in both countries. Japanese teachers commented on the lack of confidence in their English skills and the Dutch teachers expressed their concern with the lack of support and a lot of pressure from parents.  5. Regarding cultural factors that affect student autonomy, schools in Japan foster autonomy through sports day and engagement activities (kakari katsudo), while schools in the Netherlands foster autonomy through the implementation of theme learning or project work without textbooks. (Collaborative group work is a common feature of both countries. However, in Japan, there is a tendency for the group to come up with one answer, whereas in the Netherlands, opinions of individual students through dialogue with teachers were respected). Thus, in Dutch elementary schools, the students gain self-confidence through dialogue with teachers. This self-confidence leads to further challenges. The author of the thesis speculates that this factor may be at the root of their excellent position in the English proficiency ranking.   Notes about the defense The defense took place on January 30th, 2024, at Kobe City University of Foreign Studies (classroom 502), from 10:00 to 12:00. The candidate presented her dissertation for 30 minutes, after which the members of the committee asked questions and offered their comments.  The presentation by the candidate was outstanding. She summarized her dissertation very efficiently in a series of perfectly designed slides.   The committee commended the candidate for her work and pointed out that it was very good that the dissertation had established that learner’s autonomy is not a Western notion, since both Japanese and Dutch teachers recognized its components and claimed the importance of fostering it, and both Ministries of Education state so in their guidelines. Likewise, it was recognized that autonomy does not mean that teachers are not necessary, but that the role of the teacher is different than in controlling-style education.   When asked to choose what was the major difference between the Dutch and the Japanese teachers who participated in the research, the candidate referred to question 5 of the study, that is, the cultural factors that prevent the implementation of the desired learner’s autonomy. The answers reveal that group work does not always mean autonomy, since in Japan, the group consolidates its argument in one response, whereas in the Netherlands the various responses of the members of the group are recognized and valued.  When asked about the main problem that hinders learner’s autonomy in Japan, she alluded to the fact that the teachers themselves have never experienced learner autonomy and therefore training is necessary if the guidelines by MEXT are to be followed.  Teachers in Japan tend to fix the time for each step of an activity, instead of allowing students time to generate different ideas. In the discussion with the committee, it was also pointed out that teachers do not have time to plan or to coordinate the teaching with their colleagues, as well as the fact that parents are not as involved in education as their Dutch peers.  It was discussed that children and teachers in Japan must participate in many activities like kakari katsudo, sports day, etc., which are not optional and which follow a set format. So, they are not used to options within the curriculum that would allow them to be more autonomous. These activities are considered beneficial for the children. Therefore, in order to foster the autonomy that MEXT proposes, it was discussed that, whereas the activity of sports day could continue to be mandatory, it could be designed in a way that students had a choice in which competitions to participate, etc. That kind of option seems to be at play in Dutch elementary school classrooms. For instance, students can choose he place in which to study at certain times. Teachers are there as guides.   It was pointed out that the textbooks in Japan are quite infantile. They look like pre-school books, although they are aimed at 5th and 6th graders. This is a difference with the Netherlands. The candidate had brought the books that she analyzed in the dissertation and the members of the committee were able to look at the contents.   The candidate was asked to insert her opinion and interpretation of the data in several parts of the dissertation, in a bolder way than it currently appears in it.   Other issues, like lack of self-confidence in their English ability that Japanese teachers often quote, features of the system like large classes and lack of time to practice English, and the different meanings that concepts like responsibility may have in both countries were discussed.  It was established that, whereas the data do not permit to conclude that the only factor in the difference in proficiency between students in both countries is learner’s autonomy, it seems indeed like a very important one that should be considered.  Evaluation  The dissertation was deemed an important piece of work, well executed, well sustained with appropriate and rigorous research tools and useful for other teachers. With the exception of requests like minor adjustments to the way that the secondary references are quoted, a few places where some typos remained, and instructions to the author to insert her opinion in a few sections where the comparison between both countries yields notable facts, the dissertation in its current state is considered worthy of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.  

English

小学校の英語の授業における学習者の自律性：日本とオランダの教員の認識

沈 宏

神戸市外国語大学 学術情報リポジトリノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について言語: Japanese出版者:神戸市外国語大学大学院外国語学研究科博士課程文化交流専攻公開日: 2024-03-14キーワード (Ja): キーワード (En): 作成者: 沈 宏メールアドレス: 所属: 神戸市外国語大学大学院メタデータhttps://kobe-cufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000044URL97神戸市外国語大学研究科論集 第 26 号 98 沈　宏99ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について100 沈　宏101ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について102 沈　宏103ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について104 沈　宏105ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について106 沈　宏107ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について108 沈　宏109ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について110 沈　宏111ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について

Japanese

ノス彝語の形容詞における比較表現について

三杉 圭子

ガートルード・スタインの「メランクサ」――その革新性とウィリアム・ジェイムズの心理学――

神戸市外国語大学 学術情報リポジトリ表紙・標題紙・目次・執筆者一覧・奥付・裏表紙：研究年報第65号言語: Japanese出版者: 神戸市外国語大学外国学研究所公開日: 2025-01-22キーワード (Ja): キーワード (En): 作成者: メールアドレス: 所属: メタデータhttps://kobe-cufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000136URLISSN 0454-1073Research Institute for Foreign StudiesKobe City University of Foreign Studies2024vol.65Kobe City University of Foreign StudiesJournal of Research InstituteSection1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにSection2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking AreaKobe City University of Foreign StudiesJournal of Research Institute2024vol.65Section1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにSection2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area[ 目 次 / Table of Contents ]Section 1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにプロローグ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1太田 悠介Against Borders の国境廃絶論が提起するボーダーとレイシズムに関する論点について . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3梁 英聖包摂する境界という難問― メッザードラ＋ニールソン『〈方法としての境界〉』を　踏まえて考察する資本主義と人種主義 ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19　北川 眞也インターセクショナルな反人種主義の哲学― エティエンヌ・バリバールとフランスのスカーフ ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49　太田 悠介レイシズムとボーダーをめぐるディスカッション. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75鵜飼 哲梁 英聖北川 眞也太田 悠介Section 2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking AreaForeword to the Section "Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109Kaname OKANO Kenta SUGAIBačka-Srem Ruthenian Language Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111Mihajlo FEJSA Sorbian Studies from a Japanese Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131Ken SASAHARADivided between Three Countries: Banat Bulgarians in the Past and at the Beginning of the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Marinela MLADENOVAThe Role of the Outsider Perspective in the Linguistic Study of Bačka-SremRuthenian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Kaname OKANO The Patterns of Loan Noun Adaptation in the Bulgarian-Romanian Bilingual Context: The Case of a Bulgarian Dialect in Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Kenta SUGAIIdentification Focus in the Written Bulgarian Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197Eleonora YOVKOVA-SHII[ 目 次 / Table of Contents ]Section 1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにプロローグ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1太田 悠介Against Borders の国境廃絶論が提起するボーダーとレイシズムに関する論点について . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3梁 英聖包摂する境界という難問― メッザードラ＋ニールソン『〈方法としての境界〉』を　踏まえて考察する資本主義と人種主義 ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19　北川 眞也インターセクショナルな反人種主義の哲学― エティエンヌ・バリバールとフランスのスカーフ ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49　太田 悠介レイシズムとボーダーをめぐるディスカッション. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75鵜飼 哲梁 英聖北川 眞也太田 悠介Section 2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking AreaForeword to the Section "Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109Kaname OKANO Kenta SUGAIBačka-Srem Ruthenian Language Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111Mihajlo FEJSA Sorbian Studies from a Japanese Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131Ken SASAHARADivided between Three Countries: Banat Bulgarians in the Past and at the Beginning of the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Marinela MLADENOVAThe Role of the Outsider Perspective in the Linguistic Study of Bačka-SremRuthenian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Kaname OKANO The Patterns of Loan Noun Adaptation in the Bulgarian-Romanian Bilingual Context: The Case of a Bulgarian Dialect in Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Kenta SUGAIIdentification Focus in the Written Bulgarian Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197Eleonora YOVKOVA-SHII[ 目 次 / Table of Contents ]Section 1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにプロローグ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1太田 悠介Against Borders の国境廃絶論が提起するボーダーとレイシズムに関する論点について . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3梁 英聖包摂する境界という難問― メッザードラ＋ニールソン『〈方法としての境界〉』を　踏まえて考察する資本主義と人種主義 ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19　北川 眞也インターセクショナルな反人種主義の哲学― エティエンヌ・バリバールとフランスのスカーフ ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49　太田 悠介レイシズムとボーダーをめぐるディスカッション. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75鵜飼 哲梁 英聖北川 眞也太田 悠介Section 2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies:The Case of Slavic Speaking AreaForeword to the Section "Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109Kaname OKANO Kenta SUGAIBačka-Srem Ruthenian Language Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111Mihajlo FEJSA Sorbian Studies from a Japanese Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131Ken SASAHARADivided between Three Countries: Banat Bulgarians in the Past and at the Beginning of the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Marinela MLADENOVAThe Role of the Outsider Perspective in the Linguistic Study of Bačka-SremRuthenian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Kaname OKANO The Patterns of Loan Noun Adaptation in the Bulgarian-Romanian Bilingual Context: The Case of a Bulgarian Dialect in Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Kenta SUGAIIdentification Focus in the Written Bulgarian Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197Eleonora YOVKOVA-SHII2024vol.65Kobe City University of Foreign StudiesJournal of Research InstituteSection1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるために[ 目 次 ]プロローグ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1太田 悠介Against Borders の国境廃絶論が提起するボーダーとレイシズムに関する論点について . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3梁 英聖包摂する境界という難問― メッザードラ＋ニールソン『〈方法としての境界〉』を　踏まえて考察する資本主義と人種主義 ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19　北川 眞也インターセクショナルな反人種主義の哲学― エティエンヌ・バリバールとフランスのスカーフ ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49　太田 悠介レイシズムとボーダーをめぐるディスカッション. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75鵜飼 哲梁 英聖北川 眞也太田 悠介[ Table of Contents ]Prologue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Yusuke OTABorders, Racism, and Border Abolitionism: Discussion Topics about Against Borders  . . . 3RYANG Yong-SongThe Conundrum of Inclusive Borders: Capitalism and Racism Examined in Light of Mezzadra and Neilson's "Border as Method"  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Shinya KITAGAWAPhilosophy of the Intersectional Antiracism: Etienne Balibar and French Veil . . . . . . . . 49Yusuke OTADiscussion about racism and border . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75Satoshi UKAIRYANG Yong-SongShinya KITAGAWAYusuke OTA[ 執筆者一覧 ]太　田　悠　介 神戸市外国語大学総合文化コース准教授 専門分野：思想史、フランス思想 梁　　　英　聖 東京外国語大学世界言語教育センター講師 専門分野：レイシズム、在日朝鮮人差別北　川　眞　也 三重大学人文学部准教授 専門分野：地理学鵜　飼　　　哲 一橋大学名誉教授 専門分野：フランス文学・思想、ポスト植民地文化論（掲載順）Kobe City University of Foreign StudiesJournal of Research Institute2024vol.65Section2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area[ Table of Contents ]Foreword to the Section "Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109Kaname OKANO Kenta SUGAIBačka-Srem Ruthenian Language Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111Mihajlo FEJSA Sorbian Studies from a Japanese Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131Ken SASAHARADivided between Three Countries: Banat Bulgarians in the Past and at the Beginning of the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Marinela MLADENOVAThe Role of the Outsider Perspective in the Linguistic Study of Bačka-SremRuthenian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Kaname OKANO The Patterns of Loan Noun Adaptation in the Bulgarian-Romanian Bilingual Context: The Case of a Bulgarian Dialect in Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Kenta SUGAIIdentification Focus in the Written Bulgarian Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197Eleonora YOVKOVA-SHIIContributorsKaname OKANO Kobe City University of Foreign Studies/Japan Slavic Linguistics Kenta SUGAI Hokkaido University/Japan Slavic LinguisticsMihajlo FEJSA University of Novi Sad/Serbia Ruthenian and English LinguisticsKen SASAHARA Seijo University/Japan Sorbian and German LinguisticsMarinela MLADENOVA South-West University "Neofit Rilski"/Bulgaria Slavic LinguisticsEleonora YOVKOVA-SHII University of Toyama/Japan Contrastive Linguistics, Teaching Japanese as a  Second Language研究年報 第 65号／Journal of Research Institute, Vol. 65Section1：ボーダーとレイシズムを考えるためにSection2：Different Perspectives in Minority Language Studies: The Case of Slavic Speaking Area編　者：太田 悠介／岡野 要／菅井 健太Editors：Yusuke OTA／Kaname OKANO／Kenta SUGAI発行日：2024年12月20日Issued ：December 20, 2024発行所：神戸市西区学園東町9丁目1  神戸市外国語大学外国学研究所Published：Research Institute for Foreign Studies, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies9-1, Gakuen-Higashimachi, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-2187, Japan印刷所：株式会社ルネック

表紙・標題紙・目次・執筆者一覧・奥付・裏表紙：研究年報第65号

王 星月

神戸市外国語大学 学術情報リポジトリラロ語の名詞接辞言語: Japanese出版者:神戸市外国語大学大学院外国語学研究科博士課程文化交流専攻公開日: 2024-03-14キーワード (Ja): キーワード (En): 作成者: 王 星月メールアドレス: 所属: 神戸市外国語大学大学院メタデータhttps://kobe-cufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000045URL113神戸市外国語大学研究科論集 第 26 号 114 王　星月115ラロ語の名詞接辞116 王　星月117ラロ語の名詞接辞118 王　星月119ラロ語の名詞接辞120 王　星月121ラロ語の名詞接辞122 王　星月123ラロ語の名詞接辞124 王　星月125ラロ語の名詞接辞126 王　星月127ラロ語の名詞接辞128 王　星月

ラロ語の名詞接辞

中村 仁美

生き方（ライフスタイル）としてのプラグマティズム――ジェイムズ兄弟妹（シブリングス）を読む――

鵜飼 哲

梁 英聖

北川 眞也

太田 悠介

レイシズムとボーダーをめぐるディスカッション

YOVKOVA-SHII

Identification Focus in the Written Bulgarian Language

大町 綺霞

Chamorro

话语标记“不是我说”的用法及来源考察

ISSN 0289-7954神戸市外国語大学研究会神戸外大論叢2024　第 77巻Lori Zenuk-Nishide教授退職記念号横田玲子 教授退職記念号山之内克子 教授追悼号 神戸外大論叢2024　第 77巻Lori Zenuk-Nishide教授退職記念号横田玲子 教授退職記念号山之内克子 教授追悼号 [ 目 次 ]山之内 克子先生　履歴・研究業績 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1山之内克子先生の思い出 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Edgar FRANZProfessor Lori Allyson Zenuk-Nishide's Curriculum Vitae and List of Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7私の教員生活を振り返って. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17ローリーゼネック 西出Tribute for Professor Lori Zenuk-Nishide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Michael HOLLENBACK横田 玲子先生　履歴・研究業績 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25外大、大好き！皆さま、ありがとう ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31横田 玲子すべてはみんなの笑顔のために― 横田玲子先生に心からの感謝を ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37林 範彦絶望しないこととネットワークを大切にすること― またお会いしましょう、Rayco 先生 ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41山口 治彦アメリカ黒人特派員が見た太平洋戦争― チャールズ・ローブの原爆報道を手がかりに ― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43繁沢 敦子オンデマンド型オンライン授業の受講スタイルが学習態度と学習効果の評価に及ぼす影響. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73田村 美恵大学生を対象とした乳幼児ふれあい体験による親性準備性教育の研究動向―心理臨床学的アプローチの応用可能性の検討― . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89金沢 晃商取引における不可抗力の国際比較 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107　中村 嘉孝クプリーンの作品における「生」の概念と晩年における「危機からの信仰」. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123　松山 勝哉[ Contents ]Professor Yoshiko YAMANOUCHI’s Curriculum Vitae and List of Works . . . . . . . . . . . . 1In Memory of Professor Yoshiko Yamanouchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Edgar FRANZProfessor Lori Allyson Zenuk-NISHIDE’s Curriculum Vitae and List of Works . . . . . . . . . 7Reflecting on My Journey: A Farewell Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Lori ZENUK-NISHIDETribute for Professor Lori Zenuk-Nishide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Michael HOLLENBACKProfessor Rayco YOKOTA’s Curriculum Vitae and List of Works. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25I love Gaidai.  Thank you all !! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31Rayco YOKOTAAll for Everyone's Smile: with heartfelt thanks to Prof. Rayco Yokota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Norihiko HAYASHIImportant things are not to give up hope and to maintain your personal network: See you again soon, Rayco-sensei . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Haruhiko YAMAGUCHI  Black Correspondents and the Pacific War: Charles H. Loeb's Hiroshima Story and Beyond  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43Atsuko SHIGESAWARecorded Lecture Viewing Styles, Learning Attitudes and Self-evalutaion ofAcademic Effects in On-demand Online Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73　Mie TAMURAResearch Trends on the Parenthood Education Through Infant Care :Applying Clinical Psychology to the Parenthood Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89Akira KANAZAWAInternational Comparison of Force Majeure in Commercial Transactions . . . . . . . . . . 107　Yoshitaka NAKAMURA Понятие "жизнь" в творчестве А. И. Куприна и "вера из кризиса" в его позжнем творчестве. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123　Katsuya MATSUYAMA [ 執筆者一覧 ]山之内　克　子 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：ドイツ・オーストリア文化史 Edgar Franz 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：日独交流史Lori Zenuk-Nishide 神戸市外国語大学名誉教授 専門分野：English Language Education・Applied LinguisticsMichael Hollenback 神戸市外国語大学准教授 専門分野：Critical Applied Linguistics横　田　玲　子 神戸市外国語大学名誉教授 専門分野：児童英語教育・小学校英語教育林　　　範　彦 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：言語学・東南アジア地域言語学山　口　治　彦 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：談話分析・語用論繁　沢　敦　子 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：アメリカ史・ジャーナリズム史田　村　美　恵 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：社会心理学・教育心理学金　沢　　　晃 神戸市外国語大学准教授 専門分野：臨床心理学中　村　嘉　孝 神戸市外国語大学教授 専門分野：貿易契約論松　山　勝　哉 神戸市外国語大学大学院外国語学研究科博士課程 専門分野：二十世紀ロシア文学史（掲載順）編集委員：大石 高志、エグリントン みか、繁沢 敦子、伏田 寛範、下地 早智子、　　　　　安達 直樹、中村 嘉孝、常行 泰子、松川 雅信神戸外大論叢 第 77巻The Journal of  Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, Vol. 77（通巻第411号）神戸市外国語大学研究会Research Society, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies発行日：　2024年 11月 20日Issued ：　November 20, 2024発行所：　神戸市西区学園東町 9丁目 1神戸市外国語大学研究会Published：　Research Society, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies9-1, Gakuen-Higashimachi, Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-2187, Japan 印刷所：　株式会社ルネック

表紙・標題紙・目次・執筆者一覧・奥付・裏表紙：神戸外大論叢第77巻

Not a member yet