CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Adverse events associated with the Inspire implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator: A MAUDE database review
Authors
Daniel A. Benito
Daniel E. Bestourous
Luke J. Pasick
Philip E. Zapanta
Publication date
1 November 2020
Publisher
Health Sciences Research Commons
Abstract
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Background: Implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been found to be a safe and effective therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea, and patient adherence to treatment has been found to be as high as 86% after 12 months of therapy. Objective: The purpose of this study is to review the medical device reports (MDRs) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration\u27s (FDA) Manufacturer and User Device Facility Experience (MAUDE) database to identify adverse events related to HNS therapy that could hinder compliance. Methods: A search of the FDA MAUDE database was conducted using the product code “MNQ” for “Inspire stimulator for sleep apnea.” Reports of adverse events associated with Inspire for sleep apnea from January 2000 to May 2020 were included for analysis. From these included reports, event variables were collected, including event setting, adverse event to patient, iatrogenic injury, device malfunction, interventions, and root causes. Results were compiled and reviewed. Results: The search query yielded 180 reports that met inclusion criteria, containing a total of 196 adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events to patients were infection (n = 50, 34.2%), neuropraxia (n = 22, 15.1%) and hematoma/seroma (n = 17, 11.6%). A total of 83 adverse events (42.3%) required reoperation. The most common reoperations performed for adverse events to patients were explantation (n = 30, 46.2%) and device repositioning/lead revision (n = 24, 36.9%), while the most common reoperation performed for device malfunctions was device replacement (n = 10, 55.6%). Conclusion: In attempting to further improve patient compliance, understanding these device malfunctions and adverse events related to HNS implantation or usage is crucial for the identification of potential causes of patient non-adherence
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
George Washington University: Health Sciences Research Commons (HSRC)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu:sm...
Last time updated on 03/12/2020