CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Complexities of chromium carcinogenesis: Role of cellular response, repair and recovery mechanisms
Authors
Susan Ceryak
Travis J. O\u27Brien
Steven R. Patierno
Publication date
10 December 2003
Publisher
Health Sciences Research Commons
Abstract
Certain hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))-containing compounds are recognized occupational human lung carcinogens and may pose an environmental health risk. The carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) is targeted to particulate forms of moderate to low solubility. Soluble Cr(VI) oxyanions in the immediate cellular microenvironment traverse the cell membrane by non-specific anionic transporters. Cr(VI) is reductively metabolized within cells by agents including ascorbic acid (Asc), glutathione (GSH) and cysteine (Cys). During Cr(VI) reduction, a diverse range of genetic lesions are generated including Cr-DNA binary (mono) adducts, Cr-DNA ternary adducts, DNA protein crosslinks (DPCs), bi-functional (DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs)) adducts, single-strand breaks (SSBs) and oxidized bases. Some forms of Cr damage, such as ICLs, present physical barriers to DNA replication/transcription and, thus, likely promote a terminal cell fate such as apoptosis or terminal growth arrest. Other lesions, such as ternary DNA adducts, are potentially pre-mutagenic. Cr(VI) exposure elicits a classical DNA damage response within cells including activation of the p53 signaling pathway and cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Moreover, Cr(VI) also induces the ATM-dependent DNA damage response pathway which is paradoxically required for both apoptosis and survival after Cr(VI) insult. In yeast, moderately cytotoxic concentrations of Cr(VI) result in an initial G1 arrest and delayed S phase progression, whereas less toxic levels of Cr(VI) induce G2 arrest, which requires homologous recombination for exit and survival. The past several years has witnessed many important advances in our understanding of the genetic/cellular damage produced by exposure to Cr(VI). Further information is needed regarding the potential involvement of oxygen radicals in Cr genotoxicity, the specific DNA repair pathways activated by Cr and the complex signaling mechanisms involved in the cellular response to Cr(VI). These pertinent issues must be considered in relation to the potential role that each plays in the induction of human respiratory tract cancer by particulate Cr(VI) compounds. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
George Washington University: Health Sciences Research Commons (HSRC)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu:sm...
Last time updated on 03/12/2020