CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement
Authors
Gerald S. Berke
Steven Bielamowicz
+3 more
Marc S. Dauer
Bruce R. Gerratt
Jody Kreiman
Publication date
1 January 1996
Publisher
Health Sciences Research Commons
Abstract
Dysphonic voices are often analyzed using automated voice analysis software. However, the reliability of acoustic measures obtained from these programs remains unknown, particularly when they are applied to pathological voices. This study compared perturbation measures from CSpeech, Computerized Speech Laboratory, SoundScope, and a hand marking voice analysis system. Sustained vowels from 29 male and 21 female speakers with mild to severe dysphonia were digitized, and fundamental frequency (Fo), jitter, shimmer, and harmonics- or signal-to-noise ratios were computed. Commercially available acoustical analysis programs agreed well, but not perfectly, in their measures of Fo. Measures of perturbation in the various analysis packages use different algorithms, provide results in different units, and often yield values for voices that violate the assumption of quasi-periodicity. As a result, poor rank order correlations between programs using similar measures of perturbation were noted. Because measures of aperiodicity apparently cannot be reliably applied to voices that are even mildly aperiodic, we question their utility in quantifying vocal quality, especially in pathological voices. © 1996, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
CiteSeerX
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.452.3...
Last time updated on 28/10/2017
George Washington University: Health Sciences Research Commons (HSRC)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu:sm...
Last time updated on 03/12/2020