This paper presents an empirical investigation into the operational benefits of passing lanes on
rural two-lane highways. Two study sites in the state of Montana were used in this investigation.
Performance was examined at a single location upstream and multiple locations downstream of the
passing lane at each study site. Using percent followers as a performance measure, operational
benefits right after the passing lane ranged between 33% and 42% at one study site and 12% to
19% at the other study site under prevalent traffic levels. Study results also suggest that operational
benefits persist for a remarkable distance beyond the end of the passing lane