Non-invasive vascular assessment in people with type 2 diabetes: Diagnostic performance of Plethysmographic-and-Doppler derived ankle brachial index, toe brachial index, and pulse volume wave analysis for detection of peripheral arterial disease

Abstract

Objective: There is evidence that standard assessment techniques for detecting PAD might be of less diagnostic accuracy in people with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to examine diagnostic performance of Plethysmographic-and-Doppler derived ankle brachial index, toe brachial index, and Pulse volume waveform analysis for detecting PAD in people with T2DM. Methods: In this cross-sectional study 303 patients with T2DM were included in the study. The participants underwent ABI measurement, applying both Plethysmographic and Doppler derived devices, as well as TBI, PVW was also recorded for each patient. Diagnostic performance of each test for detecting PAD, applying ultrasound Doppler scan as the reference standard, was measured. Moreover, the best cut-off point for each method to detect PAD was determined. Results: PVW showed the highest sensitivity (81.8) for detecting PAD, followed by ABIDOP (72.7), and ABIPLE (20). However, all devices showed an excellent specificity for detecting PAD. The optimal cut-off point for diagnosis of PAD was 0.9 for ABIDOP, 1.2 for ABIPLE, and 0.38 for TBI. Conclusion: Within this population of patients with T2DM, TBI less than 0.38 provided the best sensitivity for detection of PAD followed by PVW, ABIDOP � 0.9, and ABIPLE < 1.2. © 2019 Primary Care Diabetes Europ