CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Diagnostic accuracy of twinkling artifact sign seen in color doppler ultrasonography in detecting microlithiasis of kidney
Authors
P. Hajalioghli
M. Letafati
+5 more
M. Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
S.M. Taheri
M.K. Tarzamni
H. Vaseghi
A. Zarrintan
Publication date
1 January 2020
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonography (US) is a safe and cost-efficient modality which is used to assess patients with urinary tract lithiasis. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the twinkling artifact of color Doppler sonography in detecting renal stones smaller than 4 mm in diameter. Methods: Of all patients referring to a tertiary medical center with a probable diagnosis of urolithiasis during April 2019 to Septem-ber 2019, 99 patients with a renal stone smaller than 4 mm in non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan entered our study. Both gray scale and color Doppler US were performed to assess the presence of any renal stones, the accompanying posterior shadowing, and the twinkling artifact for all patients. Results: Of 99 patients with confirmed renal stone on non-contrast CT scan, 91 patients had an echogenic focus on grayscale (sensi-tivity = 91.9), 70 patients had posterior shadowing sign (sensitivity = 70.7), and 76 patients had twinkling artifact on color Doppler US. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this imaging finding for detecting renal stones smaller than 4 mm were 76.8, 100, 100, and 32.4, respectively. Conclusions: Our study revealed that twinkling artifact on color Doppler US is a reliable sign for detecting renal stones smaller than 4 mm. However, the sensitivity of this sign could be increased in combination with gray scale findings (echogenic focus and posterior shadowing). © 2020, Author(s)
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
eprints Iran University of Medical Sciences
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.iums.ac.ir:23627
Last time updated on 01/12/2020