Denne artikel undersøger, hvordan jobkonsulenter realiserer og afgrænser brugerinddragelse i den danske beskæftigelsesindsats. Artiklen bygger på feltarbejde, interview og værkstedsarbejde fra en undersøgelse af jobkonsulenters arbejdsliv med individuelt planlagt job med støtte (IPS), som er en beskæftigelsesrettet metode for psykiatribrugere. Arbejdet med IPS udgør en interessant case på brugerinddragelsens potentielle betydning i beskæftigelsesindsatsen, fordi metoden som socialteknologi er udviklet i et psykiatrisk system med fokus på recovery og betoner valgfrihed for og inddragelse af brugerne. I artiklen analyseres jobkonsulenternes tolkning af brugerinddragelsen som en erfaringsproces, hvori de rekonstruerer deres problemforståelser, ansvar og opgaver i forhold til at imødekomme brugernes behov. Analysen viser, hvordan IPS-konsulenterne udvikler arbejdet. Brugerne får ansvaret for deres situation. Jobkonsulenterne accepterer brugernes bredere behovsvurderinger og forsøger at indfri deres specifikke ønsker for beskæftigelse ved at bygge bro til arbejdsmarkedet. Til tider oplever jobkonsulenterne dog usikkerhed, udmattelse og frustration på grund af uklare ansvarsfordelinger, en uoverskuelig arbejdssituation og arbejdsmarkedets krav. I artiklen tolkes disse spændinger mellem normen om brugerinddragelsen og beskæftigelsesindsatsens institutionelle betingelser ud fra Nany Frasers begreb om grænsekampe.This article investigates how job consultants realize and delimit user involvement in Danish employment services. The empirical basis is job consultants’ interpretation of user involvement in their work with the method individual placement and support, IPS. The work with IPS is an interesting case on the impact of user involvement in the work of job consultants, because the method is developed in psychiatry with a focus on ‘recovery’ and emphasizes the users’ choice, involvement and knowledge. The article draws on field work, interviews and a research workshop with the first IPS consultants in Denmark. In the article, the job consultants’ interpretation of user involvement is analyzed as an ongoing process, in which they reconstruct their understanding of their responsibilities to meet users’ needs. The analysis shows how the job consultants develop the work. They give the users the responsibilities for their situations. They accept the users’ broader assessments of their needs and the tasks they necessitate. And they attempt to bridge the gap to the labour market by following users’ wants for employment. At times, the job consultants experience uncertainty, exhaustion and frustration, because of unclear responsibilities, diffi cult working situations and the demands of employers. The article suggests that Nancy Fraser’s concept of boundary struggles may explain these tensions between the norm of user involvement and the institutionalization of employment services
