Legal documents related to a dispute between the Sawmill Slough Conservation Club vs. the University of North Floridahttps://digitalcommons.unf.edu/sawmill_history/1036/thumbnail.jp

Gray, Clare E.

English

UNF Digital Commons

University of North FloridaUNF Digital CommonsSawmill Slough History Environmental Center5-23-1990St. Johns River Water Management District:Motion to ConsolidateClare E. GrayFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/sawmill_historyPart of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Civil Law Commons, Civil ProcedureCommons, Environmental Studies Commons, and the History CommonsThis Book is brought to you for free and open access by the EnvironmentalCenter at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion inSawmill Slough History by an authorized administrator of UNF DigitalCommons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects.© 5-23-1990 All Rights ReservedRecommended CitationGray, Clare E., "St. Johns River Water Management District: Motion to Consolidate" (1990). Sawmill Slough History. 26.https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/sawmill_history/26ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TERESA BURKITT, Petitioner, v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA, Respondents. CATHLENE DENNY, Petitioner, v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA, Respondents. MICHAEL W. WOODWARD, Petitioner, v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA, Respondents. DOAH CASE NO. 90-SJRWMD FILE OF RECORD NO. 90-916A DOAH CASE NO. 90-SJRWMD FILE OF RECORD NO. 90-916B DOAH CASE NO. 90-SJRWMD FILE OF RECORD NO. 90-916C MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE The St. Johns River Water Management District (District), pursuant to Sections 22I-6.0ll, 28-5.106, and 28-5.204, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Rules 1.160 and 1.270, Fla. R. Civil Procedure, hereby moves to have the three above~styled cases consolidated. As grounds therefor, the District states: 1. Each petition seeks review of the same District Management and Storage of Surface Waters (MSSW) permit, #4-03l-0359AG. 2. Each petition alleges identical grounds for standing, alleges identical disputed issues of fact, and seeks an identical remedy. 3. The District and the permit applicant are the respondents in all three petitions. WHEREFORE, the District requests that the three petitions be consolidated and heard as one case. ARE E. RAY torney for Respondent St. Johns River Water Management District Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32178-1429 (904) 328-8321 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original and one true and correct copy of the foregoing MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE has been forwarded by United States Mail this 2j~day of May 1990 to: DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550; 2 and one true and correct copy to the following partie~ of record: TERESA BURKITT     CATHLENE DENNY    ; MICHAEL W. WOODWARD  ,    MARCIA P. PARKER, ESQUIRE Attorney for University of North Florida 1300 Building 1300 Gulf Life Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32207. 3 

St. Johns River Water Management District: Motion to Consolidate

https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=sawmill_history

St. Johns River Water Management District: Motion to Consolidate

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNF Digital Commons