Despite the extensive research that has been conducted on the debonding behaviour of FRP
strengthening systems, no standard methodology has been yet established on its experimental
characterization. In this context, to assess the performance and reliability of small scale testing
on NSM (near surface mounted) FRP strengthening systems, an experimental program was
carried out on a series of nine NSM FRP strengthening systems, in the framework of an
international Round Robin Testing (RRT). Eleven laboratories and seven manufacturers and
suppliers participated in this extensive international exercise, which regarded both NSM and
EBR FRP strengthening systems. Test results obtained for the NSM systems by the
participating laboratories are discussed and compared in this paper to investigate the feasibility
of the adopted single/double pulling shear test method, to investigate the mechanism of bond
between NSM FRP reinforcement and concrete, and to investigate the level of variability
obtained between the participating laboratories testing the same material batches.
It is concluded that the tested variants in the adopted single/double shear pulling test have a
significant influence, stressing the importance of the level of detail of standardized test
protocols for bond verification. On overall, given the variants included in this study, the
obtained variation in bond stress-slip behaviour between the laboratories remained fairly
limited.The authors wish to acknowledge the financial assistance of the European Union for the Marie Curie Research Training Network En-Core, and the support of TG 9.3 of the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). Hughes Brothers and Fortius, Magmatech, Schock, S&P, Sika, ATP, and Sto Scandinavia AB are acknowledged for their participation in the RRT and for supplying the test materials