Entre 2000 a 2013 o governo federal disponibilizou por meio de editais competitivos mais de R150bilho~esparapesquisaedesenvolvimento.Asage^nciasdefomentonacionaiseinternacionais,pormeiodosistemadeavaliac\ca~o,buscam,essencialmente,embasaroinvestimentodorecursoapartirdeindicadoresqualitativosequantitativosdaproduc\ca~ocientıˊfica.Nestecontexto,umhospitalgeralpuˊblicoeuniversitaˊrioinovahaˊmaisdetre^sdeˊcadasinvestindorecursosdeformana~ocompetitiva,apartirdeseufundodepesquisainstitucional,paraestimularodesenvolvimentodaproduc\ca~ocientıˊficanainstituic\ca~o.Emcenaˊriodeescassezderecursospuˊblicos,eˊimportanteavaliar,apartirdeindicadores,oimpactoderecursosfinanceirosinstitucionaisofertadosdeformana~ocompetitivasobreoimpulsoobservadonaproduc\ca~ocientıˊfica.Opresenteestudovisaanalisardescritivamenteaalocac\ca~oderecursosinstitucionaisparapesquisaeosindicadoresdeproduc\ca~ocientıˊficadospesquisadorescontempladosemumperıˊodode15anosemumhospitalgeralpuˊblicoeuniversitaˊrionoSuldoBrasil.ForamconsideradosnestaanaˊlisetodosospesquisadorescomcurrıˊculoLattescadastradoequetiveramdoisoumaisprojetosdepesquisaaprovadospelosComite^sdeEˊticainstitucionaisindependentedafontedefinanciamento,noperıˊodode2000a2014(n=646).Aanaˊlisedaproduc\ca~ocientıˊficaversusfomentofoirestritaaosrecursosdoFundodePesquisainstitucional.Paraanaˊlisedeproduc\ca~o,todososartigosincluıˊdosnoCVLattesdopesquisador,independentedafontedefinanciamento,foramcoletados.Osdadosrelativosaˋpoˊs−graduac\ca~oforamcoletadosjuntoaˋCAPES,osdeimpactodoperioˊdico,noJournalCitationReport.Paraanaˊlisedadistribuic\ca~odosrecursosfinanceiros,ospesquisadoresforamagrupadosconformeoaportederecursos.Osdadosforamanalisadosdescritivamente.Observou−sequehaˊ,naamostra,predomıˊniodepesquisadoresdosexofeminino,comgraduac\ca~oemmedicinaecomdoutorado,sendoquesomentemetadedestestemvıˊnculocomprogramasdepoˊs−graduac\ca~o.Ogrupodepesquisadoresnasmaioresfaixasderecursoinvestidopelofundoinstitucionalaumentouaolongodos15anosdeestudo,enquantoonuˊmerodepesquisadoresquena~oreceberamnenhumfinanciamentodiminuiunomesmoperıˊodo.Emrelac\ca~oaˋproduc\ca~o,houveaumentononuˊmerodeartigosapartirde2006atingindoumplato^em2010.Damesmaforma,houveaumentonamedianadofatordeimpactodasproduc\co~esateˊ2009,quandoseobservouestabilizac\ca~o.Foiobservada,ainda,umarelac\ca~odiretaentreconcessa~oeprodutividadecientıˊfica.Pesquisadoressemfinanciamentodofundoinstitucionalapresentarammedianadofatordeimpactodepublicac\co~esproˊximaaˋqueladosgruposdemaioraporte.Publicac\co~escommaioresfatoresdeimpactoforamobservadasparapesquisadoresdosexomasculino,comdoutorado,vinculadosaprogramasdepoˊs−graduac\ca~onotas6e7daCAPESedetentoresdebolsasdeprodutividadedoCNPq.Emboraaolongodosanostenhaseobservadoumaevoluc\ca~opositivanonuˊmerodaspublicac\co~esdepesquisadoresdainstituic\ca~o,eparec\cahaverumarelac\ca~opositivaentreinvestimentoderecursosfinanceirosinstitucionaisemaiorprodutividade,estarelac\ca~ona~oeˊuniformeena~ohaˊumreflexosignificativosobreofatordeimpactodaproduc\ca~o.Aproduc\ca~odepesquisadoresquena~oreceberamrecursosfinanceirosinstitucionaisna~odiferesignificativamentedosdemaisgruposeospesquisadoresquereceberamasmaioresquantiasdefinanciamentona~osa~onecessariamenteosmaisprodutivos.Poroutrolado,foramfornecidosrecursosdofundodeinvestimentoempesquisainstitucionalparaodesenvolvimentodeprojetosdepesquisaindependentedevıˊnculocomapoˊs−graduac\ca~o.Estegrupocorrespondeua50,8150 billion in research and development funding available through competitive tenders. National and international funding agencies seek to support their investment in research through qualitative and quantitative indicators of scientific output. Within this context, for the past three decades, a public, university-affiliated general hospital in Brazil has provided noncompetitive funding through an institutional research incentive fund to encourage intramural scientific output. In a scenario of scarce public resources, the use of indicators to assess the impact of noncompetitive funding initiatives on scientific output is particularly important. To conduct a descriptive analysis of institutional allocation of research funding at a public, university-affiliated general hospital in Southern Brazil and scientific output indicators for the recipients of such funding over a 15-year period. All investigators with a curriculum vitae (CV) posted in the Lattes platform and who had two or more research projects approved by the institutional Research Ethics Committee from 2000–2014, regardless of funding source, were included (n=646). Comparison of scientific output vs. funding was restricted to resources from the institutional Research Incentive Fund. For analysis of scientific output, all articles included in each investigator’s Lattes CV, regardless of funding source, were considered. Data on affiliation with graduate programs were collected from CAPES, while the impact factors of journals were collected from the Journal Citation Report. For analysis of distribution of financial resources, investigators were clustered by the amount of funding received. Descriptive analyses were carried out. The sample was predominantly composed of female MDs with a doctoral degree. Only half of investigators were affiliated with a graduate program. The group of investigators who received the largest amounts of funding increased over the 15-year study period, while the number of investigators who did not receive any funding decreased over the same period. Regarding output, the number of articles published increased from 2006 and plateaued in 2010. Likewise, the median impact factor of the journals in which papers were published increased before stabilizing in 2009. A positive association was found between provision of funding and researcher productivity, especially regarding the mean number of publications and median impact factor of the journals in which they were published. However, investigators who received no resourced from the institutional Fund published in journals with a median impact factor similar to those in which investigators from the higher funding groups did. Male investigators, those with a doctoral degree, those affiliated with CAPES grade 6 and 7 graduate programs and recipients of CNPq Research Productivity Scholarships were more likely to publish in journals with higher impact factors. Although institutional research output at the study hospital increased over the years, and there appears to be a positive association between institutional funding and increased productivity, this association was not uniform and was not reflected in the impact factor of the investigators’ output. The output of investigators who did not receive institutional funding did not differ significantly from that of other groups of investigators, and those who received the largest amounts of funding were not necessarily the most productive. On the other hand, our findings confirmed that resources from the institutional Fund were provided to research projects regardless of affiliation with institutional graduate programs. Unaffiliated investigators accounted for 50.8% of the overall sample and 13% of its research output. In this study, the scientific production was analyzed in a public, tertiary and university hospital and its potential relation with the granting of funds from the Research Incentive Fund (FIPE), in a non-competitive format. The results allow to delineate the scientific production scenario in the institution and to implement future decisions about the continuity and / or adjustments of this unique model of promotion to health research