Dr. Perle's article on healthcare coverage and insurance.http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=5381

Perle, Stephen M.

UB ScholarWorks

The Inalienable Rights of ManHealth Care Coverage and Our Ethical DutyBy Stephen M. Perle, DC, MSThe Declaration of Independence enumerated the inalienable rights of man to be life, liberty and the pursuitof happiness. One might argue that the right to life means there is a right to health care. Unfortunately, for amultitude of people in the United States, the loss of health insurance would be nothing short of a deathsentence. Think of the insulin-dependent diabetic or the kidney dialysis patient as examples. And then thereare the almost 50 million Americans without health care (a number that has increased along with the hugeincrease in the number of employed), who are now in a precarious situation. They often do not seek careuntil small problems become big. For example, prenatal care is rare. Often, they cannot afford primaryprevention (prevent a disease from developing) or secondary prevention (preventing an asymptomaticdisease from progressing).While Americans with health insurance may not be taking advantage of preventive services, the person withno insurance is less likely to have the funds for this care. For example, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation reports that 65 percent of insured female workers have had a pap smear within the last year,while only 44.5 percent of the uninsured have had their check-up.1In the Bible, God tells Cain that he is his "brother’s keeper." Some have translated this to mean, amongother things, that we ought to provide health care to all. Along this line of thought, there is an internationalmovement called Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The principles of this movement are twofold:21.  Inherent in the concept of sovereignty is a state’s responsibility to protect its populations.2.  If a population is suffering serious harm and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avertit, the responsibility to protect those people lies in the international community.R2P calls for military action when, for example, genocide or a country’s unwillingness to protect the healthof its citizens is present, as in Zimbabwe.3  I doubt the international community would acknowledge that the- 1 -lack of universal health care in the U.S. has risen to this magnitude. Nevertheless, the lack of universalhealth care does cause serious harm to the un- and underinsured. It seems there is a R2P for those who donot have health insurance that does not authorize military action, but political action.Universal health care is not a foreign concept to most Western democracies. Except for the U.S., universalhealth care is a right of all citizens in most modern industrialized nations. These countries all look at theU.S. as an anomaly; we will feed the world and provide doctors in Third-World nations, but will not do thesame at home. We seem to discount universal health care as a byproduct of the failed socialistic experimentthe U.S.S.R. once was.For the politically liberal, these arguments are more than adequate to support the belief that there is anethical duty to ensure that all citizens have some minimum level of health care. I have heard variousarguments against universal health care, the most extreme coming from the Social Darwinists. They believelife is a struggle and those who cannot succeed ought not let the "failures" weigh them down. One-third ofAmericans actually believe the rich owe the poor nothing.4  For these extremists, there is still an argumentto be made for universal health care - benevolent self-interest. That is, the cost of the uninsured is too greatfor the insured to bear and the insured would be better off if everyone had health insurance. Prior to the current economic crisis, one-half of all personal bankruptcies were caused by health care costs.The cost of bankruptcies is borne by all members of our economy. Various studies have looked at theeconomic impact of the uninsured. They have found that the uninsured are a drain on our economy, whichone can only imagine will get worse during this recession.It is apparent that President Obama believes every American should have health care. As health careproviders, chiropractors have an ethical duty to be concerned about the health of those who are not insuredand must defend the right of health care.References1.  Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. www.rwjf.org/files/research/coveragechartpack2009.pdf2.  Responsibility to Protect (R2P). http://r2pcoalition.org/content/view/73/93/3.  Benjamin. "Tragedy of Zimbabwe." The Washington Times, Feb. 12, 2009.4.  deWaal F. "Give Them the Social Darwin Award." TheHuffingtonPost.com, posted Oct. 6, 2007.- 2 -Click here for previous articles by Stephen M. Perle, DC, MS.Page printed from: http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=53811&no_paginate=true&p_friendly=true&no_b=true- 3 -

The Inalienable Rights Of Man: Health Care Coverage And Our Ethical Duty

http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/print_pdf.php?pr_file_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dynamicchiropractic.com%2Fmpacms%2Fdc%2Farticle.php%3Fid%3D53811%26no_paginate%3Dtrue%26p_friendly%3Dtrue&title=The%20Inalienable%20Rights%20of%20Man

The Inalienable Rights Of Man: Health Care Coverage And Our Ethical Duty

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UB ScholarWorks