Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay"

Aalseth, C. E.; Avignone III, F. T.; Barabash, A.; Boehm, F.; Brodzinski, R. L.; Collar, J. I.; Doe, P. J.; Ejiri, H.; Elliott, S. R.; Fiorini, E.; Gaitskell, R. J.; Gratta, G.; Hazama, R.; Kazkaz, K.; King III, G. S.; Kouzes, R. T.; Miley, H. S.; Moe, M. K.; Morales, A.; Morales, J.; Piepke, A.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Tornow, W.; Vogel, P.; Warner, R. A.; Wilkerson, J. F.

research

Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay"

Authors: C. E. Aalseth
F. T. Avignone III
A. Barabash
F. Boehm
R. L. Brodzinski
J. I. Collar
P. J. Doe
H. Ejiri
S. R. Elliott
E. Fiorini
R. J. Gaitskell
G. Gratta
R. Hazama
K. Kazkaz
G. S. King III
R. T. Kouzes
H. S. Miley
M. K. Moe
A. Morales
J. Morales
A. Piepke
R. G. H. Robertson
W. Tornow
P. Vogel
R. A. Warner
J. F. Wilkerson
Publication date: 7 February 2002
Publisher: 'World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt'
Doi

Abstract

We comment on the recent claim for the experimental observation of neutrinoless double-beta decay. We discuss several limitations in the analysis provided in that paper and conclude that there is no basis for the presented claim.Comment: A comment written to Modern Physics Letters A. 4 pages, no figures. Updated version, accepted for publicatio

Similar works

Full text

Open in the Core reader

Download PDF

Available Versions

Crossref

Last time updated on 17/02/2019