The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the `Lorentzian pedagogy' defended
by J.S. Bell in his essay ``How to teach special relativity'', and to explore
its consistency with Einstein's thinking from 1905 to 1952. Some remarks are
also made in this context on Weyl's philosophy of relativity and his 1918 gauge
theory. Finally, it is argued that the Lorentzian pedagogy - which stresses the
important connection between kinematics and dynamics - clarifies the role of
rods and clocks in general relativity.Comment: To be published in ``Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Length'',
C. Callender and N. Huggett (eds.), Cambridge University Press (1999). 22
pages, no figures, LaTeX, uses harvard.sty; 3 references added, typos
corrected and minor changes to conten
