Microfield Dynamics of Black Holes

A. Strominger; A. Strumia; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; B. Harms; E. Keski-Vakkuri; G. W. Gibbons; H. Umezawa; J. D. Bekenstein; J. D. Bekenstein; J. Dethlefsen; J. M. Bardeen; J. Maldacena; L. Vanzo; N. D. Birrell; P. H. Cox; R. Casadio; R. Casadio; R. Casadio; R. Casadio; R. D. Carlitz; R. Hagedorn; S. Chandrasekhar; S. Das; S. Frautschi; S. Fubini; S. W. Hawking

research

Microfield Dynamics of Black Holes

Authors: A. Strominger
A. Strumia
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
B. Harms
E. Keski-Vakkuri
G. W. Gibbons
H. Umezawa
J. D. Bekenstein
J. D. Bekenstein
J. Dethlefsen
J. M. Bardeen
J. Maldacena
L. Vanzo
N. D. Birrell
P. H. Cox
R. Casadio
R. Casadio
R. Casadio
R. Casadio
R. D. Carlitz
R. Hagedorn
S. Chandrasekhar
S. Das
S. Frautschi
S. Fubini
S. W. Hawking
Publication date: 3 December 1997
Publisher: 'American Physical Society (APS)'
Doi

Abstract

The microcanonical treatment of black holes as opposed to the canonical formulation is reviewed and some major differences are displayed. In particular the decay rates are compared in the two different pictures.Comment: 22 pages, 4 figures, Revtex, Minor change in forma

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Last time updated on 02/01/2020