Abalo A

Aird J

Bates J

Behrens F

Bhandari M

Castillo RC

Chakkalakal DA

Checketts RG

Edwards CC

Einhorn TA

Geissler WB

Gendelman HE

Gilks CF

Gopal S

Gustilo RB

Harrison WJ

Jellis JE

Loder RT

Norrish AR

Paiement GD

Rohde C

Wilson AP

We compared early post-operative rates of wound infection in HIV-positive and -negative patients presenting with open tibial fractures managed with surgical fixation.The wounds of 84 patients (85 fractures), 28 of whom were HIV positive and 56 were HIV negative, were assessed for signs of infection using the ASEPIS wound score. There were 19 women and 65 men with a mean age of 34.8 years. A total of 57 fractures (17 HIV-positive, 40 HIV-negative) treated with external fixation were also assessed using the Checkett score for pin-site infection. The remaining 28 fractures were treated with internal fixation. No significant difference in early post-operative wound infection between the two groups of patients was found (10.7% (n = 3) vs 19.6% (n = 11); relative risk (RR) 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 1.8); p = 0.32). There was also no significant difference in pin-site infection rates (17.6% (n = 3) vs 12.5% (n = 5); RR 1.62 (95% CI 0.44 to 6.07); p = 0.47).The study does not support the hypothesis that HIV significantly increases the rate of early wound or pin-site infection in open tibial fractures. We would therefore suggest that a patient’s HIV status should not alter the management of open tibial fractures in patients who have a CD4 count &gt; 350 cells/μl.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1703–7.</jats:p

N. E. Howard

M. Phaff

J. Aird

L. Wicks

P. Rollinson

Crossref

The Bone & Joint Journal

Does human immunodeficiency virus status affect early wound healing in open surgically stabilised tibial fractures?

Does human immunodeficiency virus status affect early wound healing in open surgically stabilised tibial fractures?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref