Kevin M. Beaver

Kristy Holtfreter

Michael D. Reisig

Travis C. Pratt

PurposeThe paper builds on and extends the existing research on self‐control theory and fraud. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether low self‐control increases the odds of engaging in two common forms of fraudulent behaviors: check and credit card frauds.Design/methodology/approachThe paper addresses these issues using a national, longitudinal sample of young adults.FindingsThe results of the multivariate logistic regression models indicate that individuals with lower levels of self‐control are more likely to engage in credit card and check frauds. These findings support Gottfredson and Hirschi's theoretical argument that fraudulent behavior is similar to acts of force in that it too is explained by the same underlying trait – low self‐control.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper underscores the importance of low self‐control in the etiology of fraudulent behaviors. Future researchers should examine the relationship between low self‐control and other fraudulent behaviors, particularly those occurring in the workplace (e.g. embezzlement).Practical implicationsSuggestions for preventing credit card and check frauds through situational crime prevention are provided.Originality/valueThe paper improves upon prior research by using a more representative sample and self‐reported fraudulent behavior.</jats:sec

Low self‐control and fraud offending

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref