research

Bosonization for Beginners --- Refermionization for Experts

Abstract

This tutorial gives an elementary and self-contained review of abelian bosonization in 1 dimension in a system of finite size LL, following and simplifying Haldane's constructive approach. As a non-trivial application, we rigorously resolve (following Furusaki) a recent controversy regarding the tunneling density of states, ρdos(ω)\rho_{dos} (\omega), at the site of an impurity in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid: we use finite-size refermionization to show exactly that for g=1/2 its asymptotic low-energy behavior is ρdos(ω)ω\rho_{dos}(\omega) \sim \omega. This agrees with the results of Fabrizio & Gogolin and of Furusaki, but not with those of Oreg and Finkel'stein (probably because we capture effects not included in their mean-field treatment of the Coulomb gas that they obtained by an exact mapping; their treatment of anti-commutation relations in this mapping is correct, however, contrary to recent suggestions in the literature). --- The tutorial is addressed to readers unfamiliar with bosonization, or for those interested in seeing ``all the details'' explicitly; it requires knowledge of second quantization only, not of field theory. At the same time, we hope that experts too might find useful our explicit treatment of certain subtleties -- these include the proper treatment of the so-called Klein factors that act as fermion-number ladder operators (and also ensure the anti-commutation of different species of fermion fields), the retention of terms of order 1/L, and a novel, rigorous formulation of finite-size refermionization of both eiΦ(x)e^{-i \Phi(x)} and the boson field Φ(x)\Phi (x) itself.Comment: Revtex, 70 pages. Changes: Regarding the controversial tunneling density of states at an impurity in a g=1/2 Luttinger liquid, we (1) give a new, more explicit calculation, (2) show that contrary to recent suggestions (including our own), Oreg and Finkel'stein treat fermionic anticommutation relations CORRECTLY (see Appendix K), but (3) suggest that their MEAN-FIELD treatment of their Coulomb gas may not be sufficiently accurat

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 24/08/2020