Bebchuk L. A.

Henning Piezunka

Huntington S. P.

Matthew S. Bothner

Morrill C.

Podolny J. M.

Richard Haynes

Wonjae Lee

 Merton often envisioned status growth as a process of stepping across a boundary between one status grade and another more elite status grade. Such boundaries include the border between graduate school and a top academic department that young researchers try to traverse, or the frontier between scientists outside the French Academy and scientists inside the French Academy. As it is now common to measure status continuously using network data, the behavioral ramifications of status boundaries have been understudied in recent research. In this essay, we focus on competitive behaviors that emerge near a status boundary because of the desirability—as well as the “double injustice”—of the Matthew Effect. Offering insights for future research, we discuss how these competitive behaviors are likely to delay, or even derail, status growth for those who are near a status boundary. </jats:p

Crossref

Journal of Management Inquiry

The Matthew Effect as an Unjust Competitive Advantage: Implications for Competition Near Status Boundaries

The Matthew Effect as an Unjust Competitive Advantage: Implications for Competition Near Status Boundaries

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref