This paper, as revised, was published as:
Conn, Stephen; & Garber, Bart Kaloa. (1990). "State Enforcement of Alaska Native Tribal Law: The Congressional Mandate of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act." 1989 Harvard Indian Law Symposium, pp. 99–133. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School Publications Center.Law journals, newspapers, and the courts all document Native unrest and dissatisfaction with state management of Native subsistence lifestyles. It is the thesis of this paper that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) requires the state to discover and incorporate community-derived tribal law — customs and traditions regarding the taking and gathering of wild, renewable resources — as the applicable minimum federal standard to the extent that conservation of the resource permits.Travel to symposium partially funded by the Alaska Federation of NativesI. Introduction /
II. Indian Hunting and Fishing Rights /
III. Alaska Native Hunting and Fishing Rights /
IV. ANILCA Compared With Off-Reservation Indian Hunting and Fishing Rights /
V. How Are Customary and Traditional Subsistence Practices Guided By Tribal Law