CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
Authors
Gavin Buckingham
Roland W. Fleming
Melvyn A. Goodale
Vivian C. Paulun
Publication date
15 August 2018
Publisher
Scholarship@Western
Doi
Cite
Abstract
© the American Physiological Society. The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials. J Neurophysiol 121: 996 –1010, 2019. First published January 23, 2019; doi:10.1152/jn.00199.2018.—The material-weight illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g., stone) and one that looks light (e.g., Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about the density of different materials are violated. We examined whether a similar illusion occurs when a certain weight distribution is expected (such as the metal end of a hammer being heavier), but weight is uniformly distributed. In experiment 1, participants lifted bipartite objects that appeared to be made of two materials (combinations of stone, Styrofoam, and wood) but were manipulated to have a uniform weight distribution. Most participants experienced an inverted MWI (i.e., the heavier-looking side felt heavier), suggesting an integration of incoming sensory information with density priors. However, a replication of the classic MWI was found when the objects appeared to be uniformly made of just one of the materials (experiment 2). Both illusions seemed to be independent of the forces used when the objects were lifted. When lifting bipartite objects but asked to judge the weight of the whole object, participants experienced no illusion (experiment 3). In experiment 4, we investigated weight perception in objects with a nonuniform weight distribution and again found evidence for an integration of prior and sensory information. Taken together, our seemingly contradictory results challenge most theories about the MWI. However, Bayesian integration of competing density priors with the likelihood of incoming sensory information may explain the opposing illusions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report a novel weight illusion that contradicts all current explanations of the material-weight illusion: When lifting an object composed of two materials, the heavier-looking side feels heavier, even when the true weight distribution is uniform. The opposite (classic) illusion is found when the same materials are lifted in two separate objects. Identifying the common mechanism underlying both illusions will have implications for perception more generally. A potential candidate is Bayesian inference with competing priors
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
FigShare
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:figshare.com:article/76045...
Last time updated on 30/05/2019
Scholarship@Western
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.lib.uwo.ca:brainpub-147...
Last time updated on 20/03/2021
Supporting member
Open Research Exeter
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ore.exeter.ac.uk:10871/360...
Last time updated on 02/03/2019
NEUROSURGERY ENTHUSIASTIC WOMEN SOCIETY
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:zenodo.org:1345746
Last time updated on 02/12/2022