CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Barriers, facilitators, preferences and expectations of joint protection programmes for patients with hand arthritis: A cross-sectional survey
Authors
Pavlos Bobos
Eleni Boutsikari
+5 more
Louis Ferreira
Ruby Grewal
Emily Lalone
Joy MacDermid
Christina Ziebart
Publication date
22 January 2021
Publisher
Scholarship@Western
Abstract
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Objectives The objective of this survey was to investigate the barriers, facilitators, expectations and patient preferences regarding joint protection (JP) programmes in people with hand arthritis. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Tertiary clinic. Participants Patients with hand arthritis: Osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and other forms of arthritis. Primary and secondary outcome measures This study used a survey among people with hand arthritis. Descriptive statistics and percentages were reported for all the data about the barriers, facilitators and preferences around JP. Results A total of 192 patients consented to participate. Most of the patients (82%) were unaware of JP. Factors that may act as barriers to participation and were regarded as â a very big concern\u27 were: Cost of the programme (44%), time of offering the programme (39%), work commitments (36%) and having a centre/clinic close to the house (28%). Factors that may act as facilitators and rated as â extremely helpful\u27 were: Research that shows that JP works (26%) and having the centre/clinic close to the house (25%). An online format for JP was the most preferred option (54%). Half (46%) preferred a timeframe of 1 hour, three times per week and 44% preferred a 2-hour programme, for three times per week. Conclusions Awareness of the potential benefits of JP, and prior experience with JP programme were very low. Common potentially modifiable patient-reported barriers to participate in future JP interventions, included: Cost, work commitments, distance from home to clinic and times that the intervention were provided. These barriers might be addressed with free and accessible forms of delivery of JP, which may lead to better uptake and participation in JP programmes
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Scholarship@Western
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.lib.uwo.ca:boneandjoint...
Last time updated on 20/03/2021