University of Alaska, Institute of Water Resources
Abstract
The Institute of Water Resources has sought financial assistance
for some time in an attempt to initiate research relative to the impact
of mining on water quality. Attempts were made as early as 1971 by Dr.
Timothy Tilsworth and later by Dr. Donald Cook and Dr. Sage Murphy.
These investigators anticipated growth in placer gold mining and the
development of natural resources in Alaska during a period of national
and environmental concern. The subsequent energy "crisis," the major
increase in the price of gold on the world market, and dwindling nonrenewable
resource supplies have resulted in large-scale mineral
exploration in Alaska. This exploration, coupled with development of
the trans-Alaska oil pipeline, has attracted considerable capital for
potential investment and development in Alaska. Expected industrial
growth has already started and major new projects are "just around the
corner."
Yet, as of 1976, no major research effort has occurred to determine
the extent of or potential for water quality impacts from mining operations
in Alaska. Recently a series of interdisciplinary research projects
have been completed in Canada; however, the application of Canadian data
to Alaskan problems is uncertain. Although, state and federal government
agencies have been advised and are aware of this potential problem
and lack of baseline data they have not sought out new information or
rational solutions. Even now, with deadlines of Public Law 92-500 at
hand, some regulatory agencies give the impression of attempting to
ignore the situation. Interim limitations are proposed and permits
are issued with no discernible rationale or basis. Data have not been
obtained relative to the Alaskan mining operations and thus are not
available for use in seeking solutions compatible with mining and environmental protection. Numbers appear to have been arbitrarily
assigned to permits and water quality standards. When permits are
issued, self-monitoring requirements are negligible or nonexistent.
Nor have regulatory agencies demonstrated the ability or inclination
to monitor mining operations or enforce permits and water quality
standards.
It was hoped that the project would bring together miners, environmentalists, and regulators in a cooperative effort to identify the
problems and seek solutions. The investigators recognized the political
sensitivity of the subject matter but proceeded optimistically.
Relatively good cooperation, though not total, occurred early in the
project. In April 1976, a symposium was held to exchange ideas and
determine the state-of-the-art. Although the symposium had good
attendance and an exchange of information occurred, the symposium
itself was somewhat of a disappointment. With few exceptions, the
participants aligned on one side or the other in preconceived fixed
positions. Some even chose not to attend and were therefore able to
avoid the issues. Little hard data was presented.
Optimistically, some of the miners, environmentalists, and
regulators are prepared to resolve their differences. This report,
hopefully, will be of benefit to them. It is our experience that
miners and environmentalists share a love of the land that is uniquely
Alaska. We feel that technology is available for application to this
problem for those who care about doing the job right in the "last
frontier." Whether or not it will be effectively applied to protect
Alaska's water resources is a question which remains unanswered.The work upon which this report is based was supported in part by
funds provided by the United States Department of the Interior, Office
of Water Resources Research Act of 1964, Public Law 88-379, as amended
(Project A-055-ALAS)