School of Agriculture and Land Resources Management, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station
Abstract
The authors thank Theodore Smith, Edward Kramer and Nat Goodhue
of the Division of Parks for information and comments supplied during this
study, and Frank Orth, Charles Marsh, Ed Kramer, C.E. Logsdon, and Frank
Wooding for reviewing the manuscript.
Thanks is also due the Department of Business Administration,
University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Dale Swanson, Head, for their cooperation
in this research project.The objectives of this study are to define outdoor recreation benefits to
the public and to develop a priority ranking method for proposed outdoor
recreation projects. A careful analysis of the benefits which people derive
from outdoor recreation provides a frame of reference for evaluating a
recreational facility. A project should supply those benefits which are most
highly demanded by the public. Fifteen benefits of recreation are defined
and discussed. They are divided into two major categories; those which
accrue to recreational participants and those which accrue to
non-participants.This research was supported by a grant from the Division of Parks,
State of Alaska
