Leedy discusses and reviews Copeman\u27s 1990 book

Leedy, Douglas

English

Scholarship@Claremont

Performance Practice ReviewVolume 5Number 1 Spring Article 3"Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd." ByHarold CopemanDouglas LeedyFollow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pprPart of the Music Practice CommonsThis Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted forinclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contactscholarship@cuc.claremont.edu.Leedy, Douglas (1992) ""Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd." By Harold Copeman," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 5: No.1, Article 3. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199205.01.03Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol5/iss1/3Reviews of BooksHarold Copeman. Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd. Oxford,The Author, 1990. ix, 359p.How shall we characterize Harold Copeman's Singing in Latin? Masterlyit certainly is, bringing together a great many of the most importantsources on regional pronunciations of Latin throughout Europe from thetime of Charlemagne to the present. Indispensable, undoubtedly; theauthor evaluates this source material and makes musical, sensiblerecommendations for Latin pronunciations suitable to specific works andrepertoires, filling at last what has been a virtual vacuum, with theexception of Ross Duffin's brief, preliminary study, "NationalPronunciations of Latin ca. 1490-1600",1 in an important area ofperformance practice, and creating a resource that no serious choralconductor (or singer, for that matter) can afford to overlook. Andexasperating; the author says on the first page that "this is not a formal ortidy study," and one may easily sympathize with the problems that theorganization and interpretation of so great a quantity of material haveimposed; yet decisions he has made, acting as his own publisher and,presumably, editor, about format and production methods have madethis book so unpleasant to use that one glance at it may put off many ofthose who might benefit from his wealth of knowledge and generallyexcellent advice.To take the last matter first, except for the indexes and a few otherpages, the entire book was printed from computer-generated dot-matrixoriginals. At best very fatiguing to read, dot-matrix print (which maywell be the nadir of typography, however mercifully brief itsmanifestation) has served Copeman's purposes especially badly, as hispresentation requires numerous type styles and sizes, including italic,^Journal ofMusicology 4 (1986), 217-26.103104 Harold Copemanboldface, minuscule for footnotes, and International Phonetic Alphabetsymbols. In my review copy the boldface registered barely or not at all;on over two dozen pages portions of the footnotes had faded or smearedinto illegibility. (On the bright side, Copeman's computer has given usfootnotes that actually are footnotes, Deo gratias, not data buriedsomewhere at the back of the book.)If one can get past the eye-strain induced by the printed page (and onemust), another difficulty arises, that of organization of material. Here adaunting complexity is the main obstacle, as the number of musicallyimportant places and tunes (distinguishing 16th-century Picard/Walloon,Flemish, Burgundian and Francien Latin, for example), pronunciationreforms and restorations, and other historical quirks, fascinating inthemselves (the vacillation of certain German courts between theProtestant and Roman faiths, for instance, or what pronunciation mayhave been favored by a certain Spanish musician at a German Jesuitcollege in 16th-century Rome—not a trivial case, as the musicianhappens to be Victoria), have created a logistical nightmare.Copeman's task has divided itself handily into two main parts: thepresentation of source-materials on pronunciation (a rich resource ofthis book that is drawn mainly from old grammars, tutors, and treatises,but includes information from some illustrious figures, Erasmus andMilton among them, and from a few musicians), and second, thedistillation of this material into specific recommendations. The first partof the book Copeman logically devotes to the source-materials, after anexplanation of his phonetic method and a brief history of Latin as sung.The remaining two-thirds of its pages he gives over to "Weighing theEvidence: Practical Solutions," arranged chronologically in two mainperiods, with the principal division at 1650; these periods are furthersubdivided geographically. So far, fine, but one may find the use of thispractical part of the book hampered by the fact that substantialquantities of primary material have spilled over alarmingly into it from adozen or so additional sources, resulting in constant distractions in thetext and voluminous footnotes.Another organizational difficulty is created by the fact that the history ofLatin pronunciation in England is more complex than anywhere else,thanks in part to William the Conqueror and Henry VIII, but mostly todrastic changes over many centuries in the way English itself waspronounced, especially the HGreat Vowel Shift," which went on from the15th to the 17th century, dragging Latin pronunciation along with it (as isfamiliar to us from the sound of a few well known legal Latinisms).Reviews of Books 105I'm not sure there is a better way of organizing this book thanCopeman's, yet it might have caused less frustration if the principaldivisions had been national (Italy, Germany, France, etc.) rather thanchronological; this would have consolidated the major distractionEngland poses for the non-English throughout the book—mind you, I'mby no means saying that English Latin deserves any less than the authorgives it: 154 pages, dispersed in chunks through the book's 359. (Makingit more difficult to find one's way around is the lack of visualcues—spacing, for example—to the beginnings of chapter subsections,and running heads that sometimes give an ongoing display of the chapteror section title and sometimes change capriciously from page to page.)To represent sound-values in print, Copeman uses his own simplifiedadaptation of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), except in a fewearlier phonetic sources, where he retains the original text. This mayrequire some getting used to for many musicians, I think, but it seems towork well enough as a point of departure.2Vowel quality is of course always difficult to describe. Copeman gives aschematic, cross-sectional vowel-map of the mouth (p. 25) showing theplacement of the tongue and shape of the lips for most of the basicsounds—certainly helpful, but still aproximate: the forward "a" sounds ofFrench and Italian (d la/alla) can be distinguished on this schematic(although not in the IPA, where they share the symbol [a]), but neitherthe noticeable difference between the pursed-lip and "smiley" GermanV-sound, nor the audible variation in the sound of [9] (schwa, theneutral, unstressed vowel) between German and English aredistinguished here, and go altogether unmentioned by the author. Thereal world of spoken and sung dialects is, of course, far too diverse to berepresented in a single study; by opening our ears to basic sonicdifferences, Copeman inspires a certain confidence that more minute butstill telling distinctions can be managed. (Such subtleties can be perfectlymastered only with the help of a pronunciation coach who is a languagespecialist, as Copeman wisely recommends; a lot of doubt and guessworkcould be eliminated by a recording or CD-ROM audiovisual guide to thevocal sounds.)2A good basic introduction to the IPA can be found in Diction for Singers, a ConciseReference for English, Italian, Latin, German, French and Spanish Pronunciation, by JoanWall, Robert Caidwell, Tracy Gavilanes, and Sheila Allen (Dallas: pst..., 1990). In coursetextbook format, this guide uses a slightly larger repertoire of IPA symbols thanCopeman's; its Latin is the standard Italian version.106 Harold CopemanAmericans will find an added challenge in the knowledge that the soundsdescribed in this book have been filtered through ears attuned to BritishEnglish (as the author himself takes some care to point out). We may beamused at seeing pacem rendered for the British eye as "parch 'em," orby the warning to British singers that the Verdi Requiem will require adistinction to be sounded between "pace and parce, parte and 'pate1'" (p.225). Not so amusing, perhaps, is the instruction, given here complete,to pronounce the vowel-sound represented by the IPA symbol [A] as in"but," with the admonitory footnote, "Not as in some northern English"(p. viii). After reading the entire book, I could not be certain of thesound the author has in his mind for this vowel.Can we really know how languages sounded in earlier times? Copemanmakes a very strong case that we can, more or less closely; he providesstrong contemporary testimony from various times and places thatincludes bilingual puns, homophones, and rhymes, and attempts atphonetic transliteration that still seem to inform the ear today. Whereinformation is missing or inconclusive, reasonable interpolations andextrapolations can often be made. One of Copeman's fundamentalprinciples, based firmly on the evidence we have, is that until the quiterecent adoption of Italianate Latin as a universal standard, local Latinpronunciation almost always reflected the sounds of the local vernacular.As a result, this book is not only about Latin pronunciation, but is in facta guide to the pronunciation of the major European languages anddialects in important musical centers at specific times. (In accounting forthe various changes in the sound of Latin, the author has incidentallygiven us an abbreviated history of Christian Europe from a quite unusualviewpoint.) Copeman's study is nothing less than a tour de force.Granted the possibility of recreating various historical accentuations ofLatin, is it musically worthwhile for choirs to bother with them?Copeman takes up this question at length, offering some sound andcandid advice, which, crudely summarized, suggests that the best choirswill find that choosing an appropriate Latin will make a very noticeabledifference in color and articulation in the music, a difference that shouldenhance and complement the musical style, while giving increasedpresence to the text itself, while other, less skilled choirs needn't troublethemselves with the question. He recommends trying French Latin first,as it is probably the most clearly distinct from the familiar Italian variety,certainly in its altered and often nasalized vowels, but even more in itsconspicuous stressing and lengthening of final syllables (one beautifulexample of this is Stravinsky's "Pater noster" setting), a characteristic ofFrench Latin that has consistently flummoxed German, English, andReviews of Books 107American performers. Next in order of unfamiliarity will probably bethe English Latin of Tallis and Byrd, perhaps permanently vexed withuncertainty, or that of Purcell; most singers will find the sound of thelatter, as in, for example, "Glaw-ree-ah Pay-try et Fye-lee-oh et Spy-ree-tyoo-eye Sank-toe" rather a shock at first.Any American choral group that sings music in Latin, and most do, mayfind that Copeman's book offers an opportunity to get out of apronunciation rut. Anything, in fact, that will help move the Americanchoral sound forward from the back of the throat will in my view be ablessing. Most of the vowel sounds needed to recreate the colors of thevarious Latins have nothing to do with the muzzy, neutral-soundingvowels that so commonly emanate from the mouths of Americanchoristers, not infrequently rendering one language indistinguishablefrom another. (In this connection I wish that Copeman had not omittedthe essential point that the "t," "d," and V of the Romance languages aredentals, that is, made with the tongue touching the teeth, rather than thealveolars of English, where the tongue touches the ridge behind theupper teeth. In my experience nothing does more to bring the vowels tothe front of the mouth than attention to these dental consonants.)American choral singers seem to recoil from efforts to make them awareof the mouth and its various moving parts. But this distaste, not to saysqueamishness, has to be overcome if any form of Mediterranean Latin,at least, is to be pursued toward the goal of realism.A side-effect of brighter, fronted vowels is that they make intonationalvagaries more evident, necessitating increased attention to tuning—nobad thing. Copeman deals with this briefly and, with the exception of acouple of small details, knowledgeably, in a footnote on intonation (p.238).Extended sample texts are given in an appendix, with parallel IPAnotation, for Renaissance Picard-Franco-Flemish Latin, French Latinfrom various periods (including the recent shift in France to an Italianatestyle, deplored by Copeman), Roman Latin (there is an appendix onrelevant regional Italian Latins), Spanish and Portuguese Latin (both ofwhich seem to need some consonantal fine-tuning), northern andsouthern German Latin—Saxony and Austria included—from differentperiods, and various English Latins, including several possibilities for thebedevilled Tudor period. (Those wishing to apply a Germanic accent toLatin but who themselves have little German will need more guidance onthe characteristic use of the glottal stop than Copeman gives, in a briefparagraph—not listed in the index—on p. 221. The IPA sign [1] or [|]108 Harold Copemanfor this frequent but invisible consonant would have faciliated the use ofthe German phonetic texts.) The author takes great pains to make itclear that conjecture must be a part of many of his suggested phoneticrealizations, and he sensibly offers alternatives and suggestions oninterpretation of the evidence, encouraging us to make, where necessary,our own educated guesses.In order to have all the texts he transliterates phonetically, one mustacquire Copeman's The Pocket "Singing in Latin",3 a paperback-sized, 48-page, spiral-bound companion booklet intended as a quick reference forrehearsals. In addition to the texts, this booklet contains a briefintroduction along with the summarized phonetic guides reprinted fromthe main volume, though with frequent, arbitrary additions, omissions,and changes that could cause some confusion. The pocket supplementcan't really be used, it seems to me, without the main text.The most encouraging and enjoyable approach to Copeman's study isprobably by way of his final chapter, the "Epitome," where the author'sengaging, avuncular scholarly style is at its best in his summation of thebook, and in Andrew Parrott's terse, well argued Preface. Once one hasgot adjusted to the book's visual demands, one can more easily andconfidently go on to explore this treasury of invaluable (and oftenentertaining) information. Now that Copeman has established theprincipal source materials, I should think that performers would begreatly aided by a paperback edition of his practical chapters, shorn ofprimary source intrusions and footnotes (but with references to the mainvolume), along with his introductory material and all the phonetictexts—and, needless to say, in a readable typeface. Copeman's study isso important, so vital to our understanding of the sound of a hugeproportion of our Western musical heritage, from Perotin to Poulenc,from the Carmina Burana to Webern and Arvo Part, from Power toVaughan Williams, that one would wish as few impediments as possibleto the enjoyment and practical application of it.Douglas Leedy3Oxford, 1990.

Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor\u27d.  By Harold Copeman

Keck Graduate Institute

Performance Practice Review
Volume 5
Number 1 Spring Article 3
"Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd." By
Harold Copeman
Douglas Leedy
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr
Part of the Music Practice Commons
This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact
scholarship@cuc.claremont.edu.
Leedy, Douglas (1992) ""Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd." By Harold Copeman," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 5: No.
1, Article 3. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199205.01.03
Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol5/iss1/3
Reviews of Books
Harold Copeman. Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor'd. Oxford,
The Author, 1990. ix, 359p.
How shall we characterize Harold Copeman's Singing in Latin? Masterly
it certainly is, bringing together a great many of the most important
sources on regional pronunciations of Latin throughout Europe from the
time of Charlemagne to the present. Indispensable, undoubtedly; the
author evaluates this source material and makes musical, sensible
recommendations for Latin pronunciations suitable to specific works and
repertoires, filling at last what has been a virtual vacuum, with the
exception of Ross Duffin's brief, preliminary study, "National
Pronunciations of Latin ca. 1490-1600",1 in an important area of
performance practice, and creating a resource that no serious choral
conductor (or singer, for that matter) can afford to overlook. And
exasperating; the author says on the first page that "this is not a formal or
tidy study," and one may easily sympathize with the problems that the
organization and interpretation of so great a quantity of material have
imposed; yet decisions he has made, acting as his own publisher and,
presumably, editor, about format and production methods have made
this book so unpleasant to use that one glance at it may put off many of
those who might benefit from his wealth of knowledge and generally
excellent advice.
To take the last matter first, except for the indexes and a few other
pages, the entire book was printed from computer-generated dot-matrix
originals. At best very fatiguing to read, dot-matrix print (which may
well be the nadir of typography, however mercifully brief its
manifestation) has served Copeman's purposes especially badly, as his
presentation requires numerous type styles and sizes, including italic,
^Journal ofMusicology 4 (1986), 217-26.
103
104 Harold Copeman
boldface, minuscule for footnotes, and International Phonetic Alphabet
symbols. In my review copy the boldface registered barely or not at all;
on over two dozen pages portions of the footnotes had faded or smeared
into illegibility. (On the bright side, Copeman's computer has given us
footnotes that actually are footnotes, Deo gratias, not data buried
somewhere at the back of the book.)
If one can get past the eye-strain induced by the printed page (and one
must), another difficulty arises, that of organization of material. Here a
daunting complexity is the main obstacle, as the number of musically
important places and tunes (distinguishing 16th-century Picard/Walloon,
Flemish, Burgundian and Francien Latin, for example), pronunciation
reforms and restorations, and other historical quirks, fascinating in
themselves (the vacillation of certain German courts between the
Protestant and Roman faiths, for instance, or what pronunciation may
have been favored by a certain Spanish musician at a German Jesuit
college in 16th-century Rome—not a trivial case, as the musician
happens to be Victoria), have created a logistical nightmare.
Copeman's task has divided itself handily into two main parts: the
presentation of source-materials on pronunciation (a rich resource of
this book that is drawn mainly from old grammars, tutors, and treatises,
but includes information from some illustrious figures, Erasmus and
Milton among them, and from a few musicians), and second, the
distillation of this material into specific recommendations. The first part
of the book Copeman logically devotes to the source-materials, after an
explanation of his phonetic method and a brief history of Latin as sung.
The remaining two-thirds of its pages he gives over to "Weighing the
Evidence: Practical Solutions," arranged chronologically in two main
periods, with the principal division at 1650; these periods are further
subdivided geographically. So far, fine, but one may find the use of this
practical part of the book hampered by the fact that substantial
quantities of primary material have spilled over alarmingly into it from a
dozen or so additional sources, resulting in constant distractions in the
text and voluminous footnotes.
Another organizational difficulty is created by the fact that the history of
Latin pronunciation in England is more complex than anywhere else,
thanks in part to William the Conqueror and Henry VIII, but mostly to
drastic changes over many centuries in the way English itself was
pronounced, especially the HGreat Vowel Shift," which went on from the
15th to the 17th century, dragging Latin pronunciation along with it (as is
familiar to us from the sound of a few well known legal Latinisms).
Reviews of Books 105
I'm not sure there is a better way of organizing this book than
Copeman's, yet it might have caused less frustration if the principal
divisions had been national (Italy, Germany, France, etc.) rather than
chronological; this would have consolidated the major distraction
England poses for the non-English throughout the book—mind you, I'm
by no means saying that English Latin deserves any less than the author
gives it: 154 pages, dispersed in chunks through the book's 359. (Making
it more difficult to find one's way around is the lack of visual
cues—spacing, for example—to the beginnings of chapter subsections,
and running heads that sometimes give an ongoing display of the chapter
or section title and sometimes change capriciously from page to page.)
To represent sound-values in print, Copeman uses his own simplified
adaptation of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), except in a few
earlier phonetic sources, where he retains the original text. This may
require some getting used to for many musicians, I think, but it seems to
work well enough as a point of departure.2
Vowel quality is of course always difficult to describe. Copeman gives a
schematic, cross-sectional vowel-map of the mouth (p. 25) showing the
placement of the tongue and shape of the lips for most of the basic
sounds—certainly helpful, but still aproximate: the forward "a" sounds of
French and Italian (d la/alla) can be distinguished on this schematic
(although not in the IPA, where they share the symbol [a]), but neither
the noticeable difference between the pursed-lip and "smiley" German
V-sound, nor the audible variation in the sound of [9] (schwa, the
neutral, unstressed vowel) between German and English are
distinguished here, and go altogether unmentioned by the author. The
real world of spoken and sung dialects is, of course, far too diverse to be
represented in a single study; by opening our ears to basic sonic
differences, Copeman inspires a certain confidence that more minute but
still telling distinctions can be managed. (Such subtleties can be perfectly
mastered only with the help of a pronunciation coach who is a language
specialist, as Copeman wisely recommends; a lot of doubt and guesswork
could be eliminated by a recording or CD-ROM audiovisual guide to the
vocal sounds.)
2A good basic introduction to the IPA can be found in Diction for Singers, a Concise
Reference for English, Italian, Latin, German, French and Spanish Pronunciation, by Joan
Wall, Robert Caidwell, Tracy Gavilanes, and Sheila Allen (Dallas: pst..., 1990). In course
textbook format, this guide uses a slightly larger repertoire of IPA symbols than
Copeman's; its Latin is the standard Italian version.
106 Harold Copeman
Americans will find an added challenge in the knowledge that the sounds
described in this book have been filtered through ears attuned to British
English (as the author himself takes some care to point out). We may be
amused at seeing pacem rendered for the British eye as "parch 'em," or
by the warning to British singers that the Verdi Requiem will require a
distinction to be sounded between "pace and parce, parte and 'pate1'" (p.
225). Not so amusing, perhaps, is the instruction, given here complete,
to pronounce the vowel-sound represented by the IPA symbol [A] as in
"but," with the admonitory footnote, "Not as in some northern English"
(p. viii). After reading the entire book, I could not be certain of the
sound the author has in his mind for this vowel.
Can we really know how languages sounded in earlier times? Copeman
makes a very strong case that we can, more or less closely; he provides
strong contemporary testimony from various times and places that
includes bilingual puns, homophones, and rhymes, and attempts at
phonetic transliteration that still seem to inform the ear today. Where
information is missing or inconclusive, reasonable interpolations and
extrapolations can often be made. One of Copeman's fundamental
principles, based firmly on the evidence we have, is that until the quite
recent adoption of Italianate Latin as a universal standard, local Latin
pronunciation almost always reflected the sounds of the local vernacular.
As a result, this book is not only about Latin pronunciation, but is in fact
a guide to the pronunciation of the major European languages and
dialects in important musical centers at specific times. (In accounting for
the various changes in the sound of Latin, the author has incidentally
given us an abbreviated history of Christian Europe from a quite unusual
viewpoint.) Copeman's study is nothing less than a tour de force.
Granted the possibility of recreating various historical accentuations of
Latin, is it musically worthwhile for choirs to bother with them?
Copeman takes up this question at length, offering some sound and
candid advice, which, crudely summarized, suggests that the best choirs
will find that choosing an appropriate Latin will make a very noticeable
difference in color and articulation in the music, a difference that should
enhance and complement the musical style, while giving increased
presence to the text itself, while other, less skilled choirs needn't trouble
themselves with the question. He recommends trying French Latin first,
as it is probably the most clearly distinct from the familiar Italian variety,
certainly in its altered and often nasalized vowels, but even more in its
conspicuous stressing and lengthening of final syllables (one beautiful
example of this is Stravinsky's "Pater noster" setting), a characteristic of
French Latin that has consistently flummoxed German, English, and
Reviews of Books 107
American performers. Next in order of unfamiliarity will probably be
the English Latin of Tallis and Byrd, perhaps permanently vexed with
uncertainty, or that of Purcell; most singers will find the sound of the
latter, as in, for example, "Glaw-ree-ah Pay-try et Fye-lee-oh et Spy-ree-
tyoo-eye Sank-toe" rather a shock at first.
Any American choral group that sings music in Latin, and most do, may
find that Copeman's book offers an opportunity to get out of a
pronunciation rut. Anything, in fact, that will help move the American
choral sound forward from the back of the throat will in my view be a
blessing. Most of the vowel sounds needed to recreate the colors of the
various Latins have nothing to do with the muzzy, neutral-sounding
vowels that so commonly emanate from the mouths of American
choristers, not infrequently rendering one language indistinguishable
from another. (In this connection I wish that Copeman had not omitted
the essential point that the "t," "d," and V of the Romance languages are
dentals, that is, made with the tongue touching the teeth, rather than the
alveolars of English, where the tongue touches the ridge behind the
upper teeth. In my experience nothing does more to bring the vowels to
the front of the mouth than attention to these dental consonants.)
American choral singers seem to recoil from efforts to make them aware
of the mouth and its various moving parts. But this distaste, not to say
squeamishness, has to be overcome if any form of Mediterranean Latin,
at least, is to be pursued toward the goal of realism.
A side-effect of brighter, fronted vowels is that they make intonational
vagaries more evident, necessitating increased attention to tuning—no
bad thing. Copeman deals with this briefly and, with the exception of a
couple of small details, knowledgeably, in a footnote on intonation (p.
238).
Extended sample texts are given in an appendix, with parallel IPA
notation, for Renaissance Picard-Franco-Flemish Latin, French Latin
from various periods (including the recent shift in France to an Italianate
style, deplored by Copeman), Roman Latin (there is an appendix on
relevant regional Italian Latins), Spanish and Portuguese Latin (both of
which seem to need some consonantal fine-tuning), northern and
southern German Latin—Saxony and Austria included—from different
periods, and various English Latins, including several possibilities for the
bedevilled Tudor period. (Those wishing to apply a Germanic accent to
Latin but who themselves have little German will need more guidance on
the characteristic use of the glottal stop than Copeman gives, in a brief
paragraph—not listed in the index—on p. 221. The IPA sign [1] or [|]
108 Harold Copeman
for this frequent but invisible consonant would have faciliated the use of
the German phonetic texts.) The author takes great pains to make it
clear that conjecture must be a part of many of his suggested phonetic
realizations, and he sensibly offers alternatives and suggestions on
interpretation of the evidence, encouraging us to make, where necessary,
our own educated guesses.
In order to have all the texts he transliterates phonetically, one must
acquire Copeman's The Pocket "Singing in Latin",3 a paperback-sized, 48-
page, spiral-bound companion booklet intended as a quick reference for
rehearsals. In addition to the texts, this booklet contains a brief
introduction along with the summarized phonetic guides reprinted from
the main volume, though with frequent, arbitrary additions, omissions,
and changes that could cause some confusion. The pocket supplement
can't really be used, it seems to me, without the main text.
The most encouraging and enjoyable approach to Copeman's study is
probably by way of his final chapter, the "Epitome," where the author's
engaging, avuncular scholarly style is at its best in his summation of the
book, and in Andrew Parrott's terse, well argued Preface. Once one has
got adjusted to the book's visual demands, one can more easily and
confidently go on to explore this treasury of invaluable (and often
entertaining) information. Now that Copeman has established the
principal source materials, I should think that performers would be
greatly aided by a paperback edition of his practical chapters, shorn of
primary source intrusions and footnotes (but with references to the main
volume), along with his introductory material and all the phonetic
texts—and, needless to say, in a readable typeface. Copeman's study is
so important, so vital to our understanding of the sound of a huge
proportion of our Western musical heritage, from Perotin to Poulenc,
from the Carmina Burana to Webern and Arvo Part, from Power to
Vaughan Williams, that one would wish as few impediments as possible
to the enjoyment and practical application of it.
Douglas Leedy
3Oxford, 1990.


https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&amp;context=ppr

Singing in Latin, or, Pronunciation explor\u27d. By Harold Copeman

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Scholarship@Claremont

Keck Graduate Institute