Reference Governors: From Theory to Practice

Abstract

Control systems that are subject to constraints due to physical limitations, hardware protection, or safety considerations have led to challenging control problems that have piqued the interest of control practitioners and theoreticians for many decades. In general, the design of constraint management schemes must meet several stringent requirements, for example: low computational burden, performance, recovery mechanisms from infeasibility conditions, robustness, and formulation simplicity. These requirements have been particularly difficult to meet for the following three classes of systems: stochastic systems, linear systems driven by unmodeled disturbances, and nonlinear systems. Hence, in this work, we develop three constraint management schemes, based on Reference Governor (RG), for these classes of systems. The first scheme, which is referred to as Stochastic RG, leverages the ideas of chance constraints to construct a Stochastic Robustly Invariant Maximal Output Admissible set (SR-MAS) in order to enforce constraints on stochastic systems. The second scheme, which is called Recovery RG (RRG), addresses the problem of recovery from infeasibility conditions by implementing a disturbance observer to update the MAS, and hence recover from constraint violations due to unmodeled disturbances. The third method addresses the problem of constraint satisfaction on nonlinear systems by decomposing the design of the constraint management strategy into two parts: enforcement at steady-state, and during transient. The former is achieved by using the forward and inverse steady-state characterization of the nonlinear system. The latter is achieved by implementing an RG-based approach, which employs a novel Robust Output Admissible Set (ROAS) that is computed using data obtained from the nonlinear system. Added to this, this dissertation includes a detailed literature review of existing constraint management schemes to compare and highlight advantages and disadvantages between them. Finally, all this study is supported by a systematic analysis, as well as numerical and experimental validation of the closed-loop systems performance on vehicle roll-over avoidance, turbocharged engine control, and inverted pendulum control problems

    Similar works