Davies G

Gerard Malanga

Gogna P

Guillodo Y

Hubbard TJ

Jain K

Kaux JF

Ken Mautner

Khaliq A

Maffulli N

Raeissadat SA

Reynolds JF

Walter I Sussman

Yadav R

Zayni R

Zhou Y

 Aim: Significant variability exists in the literature, with no clear consensus to the optimal protocol after a regenerative procedure. Given this uncertainty, the authors systematically reviewed the literature cataloging the different variables that may influence outcomes. Methods: Search was limited to randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies of regenerative procedures for the treatment of tendinopathy. Variables were predetermined, and included: cyrotherapy, pre- and post-procedure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use, recommendations for alternative pain medications, immobilization and duration of rest. Variables were categorized based on the influence of the intervention on the three phases of healing. Results: 749 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 60 studies were included. Significant variability existed in the literature. Conclusion: Despite the importance of rehabilitation after regenerative procedures, there is a paucity of evidence available to guide clinicians and highlights the need for additional validation. </jats:p

Crossref

Regenerative Medicine

The role of rehabilitation after regenerative and orthobiologic procedures for the treatment of tendinopathy: a systematic review

The role of rehabilitation after regenerative and orthobiologic procedures for the treatment of tendinopathy: a systematic review

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref