This book is the result of Sean Stroud’s doctoral research, with which he earned a PhD 
from King’s College London in 2005, under the supervision of Professor David 
Treece. Since then, Stroud has continued his studies in the same field: Brazilian popular

Boto, Sandra

Sapientia (Univ. do Algarve)

  Lied und populäre Kultur/ Song and Popular Culture  Jahrbuch des Deutschen  Volksliedarchivs Freiburg  herausgegeben von  Nils Grosch und Fernand Hörner  56. Jahrgang  –  2011  Original und Kopie Original and Copy    Waxmann  Münster / New York München / Berlin Rezensionen – Reviews 348 the case of Phil Spector) in the larger social worlds of musical genres and eras in which they operated. He masterfully draws from their experience the constant question of Jewishness and its relation to a black-white binary within different societies. He de-serves credit for distinguishing the circumstances of Anglophone countries in the West and invites testing of the »whitening« thesis in other European countries, particularly those with consciousness of black music and social categorization of racialized black-ness. Stratton reminds scholars relegating blackface and racialization to a distant, un-enlightened past of the scholarly challenge of viewing subtle, but profound, meanings of blackness and Jewishness (and their implications of marginalization) into the con-temporary, global age. Simon J. Bronner, Pennsylvania State University Stroud, Sean: The Defence of Tradition in Brazilian Popular Music. Politics, Culture and the Creation of Música Popular Brasileira. Aldershot: Ashgate 2008. IX, 215 S., ISBN 978-0-75466-343-0. This book is the result of Sean Stroud’s doctoral research, with which he earned a PhD from King’s College London in 2005, under the supervision of Professor David Treece. Since then, Stroud has continued his studies in the same field: Brazilian popu-lar music.   How does Sean Stroud approach this subject, both specific and general at the same time? This might well be the wrong question, as the book presents a multiple approach, combining several scientific disciplines such as musicology, mass culture, cultural studies, music history, history of politics, history of ideas, and even sociology and anthropology. However, calling his method a »polyhedral approach« is not a new idea: Sean Stroud’s book has been reviewed twice, and both Lisa Shaw, in the Journal of Latin American Studies, No. 41, 2009, pp. 183–184, and Marcos Napolitano, in ArtCultura, Uberlândia, v. 10, No. 17, July–December. 2008, pp. 245–249, pointed out this same feature in two well-informed and extremely lucid opinions on Stroud’s work and his field of research. The book in question is divided into seven chapters, plus an introduction and a conclusion. Stroud begins his Introduction by presenting the aims and methodology of his work. He offers some preliminary thoughts on Brazilian Popular Music (hence-forth, MPB), taking the pioneering works of the Brazilian Modernism in the first decades of the 20th century as a starting point, marked by the prominent figure of Mário de Andrade. Stroud also alludes to the problematic issues of MPB, and to some concepts which will be used and sanctioned throughout his book, such as »tradition«, »quality« and »authenticity«. Chapter I is devoted to musical nationalism, as opposed to foreign »cultural inva-sion«. After a (too) short historical outline of such a fertile subject, Stroud precipitates the reader into the history of Brazilian musical nationalism since the 19th century and analyses the changes that have affected this notion up to the recent past. He goes on to consider the characters and institutions that have directly contributed to the creation and development of Brazilian musical nationalism.  Rezensionen – Reviews 349 Chapter II is entirely devoted to the »invention« of MPB, a symbol of Brazilian musical pride since the 1960s. It also points out the most important matters related to this phenomenon,that is: the significant status achieved by MPB and the contribution of the music industry and of the Brazilian press to its success.  In Chapter III, Stroud thoroughly analyses the role of television, one of the most important instruments of mass culture, and emphasises the significance of singing contests and TV soap operas (the Brazilian novelas) as the main vehicles of MPB and Brazilian popular music in general.  The following chapter, on the other hand, describes the policies implemented by the music industry in Brazil and the pressure of musical globalisation, regarding a capitulation to external influences which are not present in the origins of Brazilian music. Stroud concludes that, despite the most important music companies in Brazil being under the control of foreign investors, no loss of cultural models has been suf-fered or, at least, musical models have remained intact. On the contrary, an interesting synthesis has emerged.  Chapter V is devoted to the efforts deployed by the Brazilian State in the field of Brazilian popular music since the 1960s, especially to the measures taken during the military dictatorship (the Política Nacional de Cultura, FUNARTE, or the Projeto Pixinguinha), which represent the regime’s position with regard to culture and to the need to develop tastes and aesthetic values. Paradoxically, this resulted in the promo-tion of national popular music.  However, there are other political factors, besides the governmental intervention, that affect the promotion of Brazilian popular music: in chapter VI Stroud examines some private companies (related to the left-wing opposition during the dictatorship years) in order to compile and study Brazilian folklore. This different way of understanding the meaning of »popular« – based upon the value of the knowledge and cultural legacy of rural communities – engaged several research groups in the quest for popular music, with the purpose of drawing a musical map of the vast Brazilian lands. Sean Stroud summarises the history of these musical expeditions, from Mário de Andrade’s Missão de Pesquisas Folclóricas (1938) onwards, and discusses some concepts attached to this idea of popular music.  The last chapter, No. VII, follows the lead of its predecessor and completes the chronological history of these musical expeditions up to the present, adding a few personal thoughts about the latest projects of this kind developed in Brazil: Música do Brasil (2000), by Hermano Vianna, who advocates an anthropological approach and is concerned with cultural mediation as animation, and Rumos Itaú Cultural Música (2000–2001), which gives a regionalist point of view, pursuing the preservation of »traditional« music. Rumos Itaú Cultural Música is, as Música do Brasil, a programme concerned to map Brasilian music, not only traditonal music, but mainly »music with Rezensionen – Reviews 350 its roots based in tradition«. Its most important aim was to find musicians and per-formers in other places away from the great Brasilian musical centres.45 Finally, the Conclusion allows us to recall, after such an avalanche of (often disor-ganised) information, the main point of the subject: the debate about the rise and fall of MPB, a symbol of musical nationalism, and the insistence on the defence of Brazil-ian popular music, in a wider sense, as it is advocated throughout the book.  As mentioned by the author in his Introduction, »one of the primary intentions of this book is to identify the influence of those actors in delineating the parameters of Brazilian popular music, and more particularly the construction of a tradition within the wider sphere of popular music as a whole, i.e., Música Popular Brasileira (MPB), the socio/cultural/musical movement that has dominated the artistic scene in Brazil since the mid 1960s.« (pp. 1–2) Nonetheless, this central issue bifurcates into two main subjects, more or less independent, that can be traced both along the seven chap-ters of the book and in Stroud’s discourse: on the one hand, his research tries to ex-plain how and why MPB has come to achieve such a remarkable role in the Brazilian cultural scene from the 1960s on, despite some contradictions denounced by the au-thor, such as MPB’s insignificant sales volume; on the other hand, Sean Stroud’s work is anchored to the attempt to provide the idea of a »tradition« in Brazilian popular music with solid foundations. It is not my intention to question the notion of »tradi-tion«, although the idea itself is easily problematic, as it could interfere with the au-thor’s thesis. As a matter of fact, Stroud believes that, since the Modernist Movement of the 1920s, »tradition« has been defended in different moments of Brazil’s recent history in different ways and by different actors such as the Brazilian music industry, TV and Government initiatives, among others.  The book’s methodology is its most controversial aspect. As the author says: »My approach within this study is to provide a historical narrative of the rise and fall of MPB, with a specific emphasis on the manner in which popular music interacts with political and social factors. For this reason I do not provide any textual or musical analysis of the music under discussion.« (p. 7) Although I can understand that, at some points, quoting literary and musical sources is not necessary (for instance when Stroud approaches the role of the music industry or the State’s intervention in his considera-tion of music as a cultural phenomenon), I believe that musical categories as sensitive as the ones mentioned transversely in this book (as well as the problematic concepts of popular music, traditional, authentic, popularesca or even brega, with the subjective and impressionistic meaning that some carry) would require paying more scientific attention to the fulcrum of this study, music – let it not be forgotten – which has a particular language and a metalanguage. However, we must not underestimate the contribution of The Defence of Tradition in Brazilian Popular Music to the understanding of the relationship between Brazilian popular music and its political, cultural and social environment – that has been exten-                                              45 See, for further information about aims, expectations and results, the project web site http://www.itaucultural.org.br/index.cfm?cd_pagina=2691, accessed 06.07. 2011. Rezensionen – Reviews 351 sively modified in the last decades. On the contrary, this work, the result of an honest research backed with excellent bibliography and remarkable direct sources (not so much for musical sources, though), sketches a line of thinking surprisingly exempt and apart from the mainstream path in the scene of Brazilian popular music so far, which is worth mentioning. It would be desirable, and I sustain that desire, that further re-search should undertake the leads hinted at in Stroud’s work, and tackle, complete, and revise accurately the many theoretical problems that appear in the book.  I would like to raise two final questions related to musicology (although other dis-ciplines could also be mentioned) brought about by my reading of this book. In the first place, I would consider the revision of the concept of MPB nowadays important enough to give rise to a particular study, but Stroud dedicates only a few short para-graphs to it. How can we musically define MPB? Which are the common features (concerning its poetical and musical language) of the corpus canonically classified as MPB? Is it now a crystallised music genre? What happened to the political dimension assumed by MPB during the dictatorship years? Did other popular genres assume this dimension instead of MPB? Or is the idea itself of MPB that must be updated by welcoming non canonic interpreters and songs? Finally, I must disagree with the use of subjective classifications such as brega or authentic music, which are mere impression-istic terms, to classify a music genre, because there are certainly enough musical and literary trends to mention and define these musical styles. From the musicological point of view, it is definitely an interesting path and Stroud’s work is a good starting point. Sandra Boto, Lissabon Suppan, Wolfgang: Steirisches Musiklexikon. 2. völlig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 2009. XII, 804 S., ISBN 978-3-20101-888-3. In dreierlei Bedeutung könne von der Musik eines Landes die Rede sein, schreibt Viktor Zuckerkandl, als Schauplatz für Musik, als Quelle insofern, als Menschen man-ches, was sie zu sagen hätten, nicht anders als in Tönen sagen könnten und schließlich als Schöpfung im doppelten Sinne: »Musik als Schöpfung des Landes, das Land als Schöpfung der Musik«46. Einen Textausschnitt davon stellt Wolfgang Suppan pro-grammatisch der neuen Auflage des Steirischen Musiklexikons voran (S. V). Suppan arbeitete ab 1963 am Deutschen Volksliedarchiv in Freiburg und wurde 1974 als Ordinarius für Musikethnologie an die damalige Hochschule für Musik und darstel-lende Kunst nach Graz berufen. Seit nunmehr fünf Jahrzehnten prägt er solcherart Musikethnologie und Volksliedforschung und setzte am Grazer Institut für Musiketh-nologie damals neue thematische Akzente: Neben europäischer und vergleichender Volkslied- und Volksmusikforschung oder Anthropologie der Musik gehörte dazu auch die landeskundliche Musikforschung in der Steiermark.                                               46 Zuckerkandl, Viktor: Das Österreichische in der Musik. In: Speculum Austriae. Hg. von Otto Schulmeister. Wien 1957, S. 524–553. 

Stroud, sean: the defence of tradition in Brazilian popular music. Politics, culture and the creation of música popular brasileira.

Estudo Geral

 
 
Lied und populäre Kultur/ 
Song and Popular Culture 
 
Jahrbuch des Deutschen  
Volksliedarchivs Freiburg 
 
herausgegeben von  
Nils Grosch und Fernand Hörner 
 
56. Jahrgang  –  2011 
 
Original und Kopie 
Original and Copy 
 
 
 
Waxmann  
Münster / New York 
München / Berlin 
Rezensionen – Reviews 
348 
the case of Phil Spector) in the larger social worlds of musical genres and eras in which 
they operated. He masterfully draws from their experience the constant question of 
Jewishness and its relation to a black-white binary within different societies. He de-
serves credit for distinguishing the circumstances of Anglophone countries in the West 
and invites testing of the »whitening« thesis in other European countries, particularly 
those with consciousness of black music and social categorization of racialized black-
ness. Stratton reminds scholars relegating blackface and racialization to a distant, un-
enlightened past of the scholarly challenge of viewing subtle, but profound, meanings 
of blackness and Jewishness (and their implications of marginalization) into the con-
temporary, global age. 
Simon J. Bronner, Pennsylvania State University 
Stroud, Sean: The Defence of Tradition in Brazilian Popular Music. Politics, Culture 
and the Creation of Música Popular Brasileira. Aldershot: Ashgate 2008. IX, 215 S., 
ISBN 978-0-75466-343-0. 
This book is the result of Sean Stroud’s doctoral research, with which he earned a PhD 
from King’s College London in 2005, under the supervision of Professor David 
Treece. Since then, Stroud has continued his studies in the same field: Brazilian popu-
lar music.  
 How does Sean Stroud approach this subject, both specific and general at the 
same time? This might well be the wrong question, as the book presents a multiple 
approach, combining several scientific disciplines such as musicology, mass culture, 
cultural studies, music history, history of politics, history of ideas, and even sociology 
and anthropology. However, calling his method a »polyhedral approach« is not a new 
idea: Sean Stroud’s book has been reviewed twice, and both Lisa Shaw, in the Journal 
of Latin American Studies, No. 41, 2009, pp. 183–184, and Marcos Napolitano, 
in ArtCultura, Uberlândia, v. 10, No. 17, July–December. 2008, pp. 245–249, 
pointed out this same feature in two well-informed and extremely lucid opinions on 
Stroud’s work and his field of research. 
The book in question is divided into seven chapters, plus an introduction and a 
conclusion. Stroud begins his Introduction by presenting the aims and methodology of 
his work. He offers some preliminary thoughts on Brazilian Popular Music (hence-
forth, MPB), taking the pioneering works of the Brazilian Modernism in the first 
decades of the 20th century as a starting point, marked by the prominent figure of 
Mário de Andrade. Stroud also alludes to the problematic issues of MPB, and to some 
concepts which will be used and sanctioned throughout his book, such as »tradition«, 
»quality« and »authenticity«. 
Chapter I is devoted to musical nationalism, as opposed to foreign »cultural inva-
sion«. After a (too) short historical outline of such a fertile subject, Stroud precipitates 
the reader into the history of Brazilian musical nationalism since the 19th century and 
analyses the changes that have affected this notion up to the recent past. He goes on to 
consider the characters and institutions that have directly contributed to the creation 
and development of Brazilian musical nationalism.  
Rezensionen – Reviews 
349 
Chapter II is entirely devoted to the »invention« of MPB, a symbol of Brazilian 
musical pride since the 1960s. It also points out the most important matters related to 
this phenomenon,that is: the significant status achieved by MPB and the contribution 
of the music industry and of the Brazilian press to its success.  
In Chapter III, Stroud thoroughly analyses the role of television, one of the most 
important instruments of mass culture, and emphasises the significance of singing 
contests and TV soap operas (the Brazilian novelas) as the main vehicles of MPB and 
Brazilian popular music in general.  
The following chapter, on the other hand, describes the policies implemented by 
the music industry in Brazil and the pressure of musical globalisation, regarding a 
capitulation to external influences which are not present in the origins of Brazilian 
music. Stroud concludes that, despite the most important music companies in Brazil 
being under the control of foreign investors, no loss of cultural models has been suf-
fered or, at least, musical models have remained intact. On the contrary, an interesting 
synthesis has emerged.  
Chapter V is devoted to the efforts deployed by the Brazilian State in the field 
of Brazilian popular music since the 1960s, especially to the measures taken during the 
military dictatorship (the Política Nacional de Cultura, FUNARTE, or the Projeto 
Pixinguinha), which represent the regime’s position with regard to culture and to the 
need to develop tastes and aesthetic values. Paradoxically, this resulted in the promo-
tion of national popular music.  
However, there are other political factors, besides the governmental intervention, 
that affect the promotion of Brazilian popular music: in chapter VI Stroud examines 
some private companies (related to the left-wing opposition during the dictatorship 
years) in order to compile and study Brazilian folklore. 
This different way of understanding the meaning of »popular« – based upon the 
value of the knowledge and cultural legacy of rural communities – engaged several 
research groups in the quest for popular music, with the purpose of drawing a musical 
map of the vast Brazilian lands. Sean Stroud summarises the history of these musical 
expeditions, from Mário de Andrade’s Missão de Pesquisas Folclóricas (1938) onwards, 
and discusses some concepts attached to this idea of popular music.  
The last chapter, No. VII, follows the lead of its predecessor and completes the 
chronological history of these musical expeditions up to the present, adding a few 
personal thoughts about the latest projects of this kind developed in Brazil: Música do 
Brasil (2000), by Hermano Vianna, who advocates an anthropological approach and is 
concerned with cultural mediation as animation, and Rumos Itaú Cultural Música 
(2000–2001), which gives a regionalist point of view, pursuing the preservation of 
»traditional« music. Rumos Itaú Cultural Música is, as Música do Brasil, a programme 
concerned to map Brasilian music, not only traditonal music, but mainly »music with 
Rezensionen – Reviews 
350 
its roots based in tradition«. Its most important aim was to find musicians and per-
formers in other places away from the great Brasilian musical centres.45 
Finally, the Conclusion allows us to recall, after such an avalanche of (often disor-
ganised) information, the main point of the subject: the debate about the rise and fall 
of MPB, a symbol of musical nationalism, and the insistence on the defence of Brazil-
ian popular music, in a wider sense, as it is advocated throughout the book.  
As mentioned by the author in his Introduction, »one of the primary intentions of 
this book is to identify the influence of those actors in delineating the parameters of 
Brazilian popular music, and more particularly the construction of a tradition within 
the wider sphere of popular music as a whole, i.e., Música Popular Brasileira (MPB), 
the socio/cultural/musical movement that has dominated the artistic scene in Brazil 
since the mid 1960s.« (pp. 1–2) Nonetheless, this central issue bifurcates into two 
main subjects, more or less independent, that can be traced both along the seven chap-
ters of the book and in Stroud’s discourse: on the one hand, his research tries to ex-
plain how and why MPB has come to achieve such a remarkable role in the Brazilian 
cultural scene from the 1960s on, despite some contradictions denounced by the au-
thor, such as MPB’s insignificant sales volume; on the other hand, Sean Stroud’s work 
is anchored to the attempt to provide the idea of a »tradition« in Brazilian popular 
music with solid foundations. It is not my intention to question the notion of »tradi-
tion«, although the idea itself is easily problematic, as it could interfere with the au-
thor’s thesis. As a matter of fact, Stroud believes that, since the Modernist Movement 
of the 1920s, »tradition« has been defended in different moments of Brazil’s recent 
history in different ways and by different actors such as the Brazilian music industry, 
TV and Government initiatives, among others.  
The book’s methodology is its most controversial aspect. As the author says: »My 
approach within this study is to provide a historical narrative of the rise and fall of 
MPB, with a specific emphasis on the manner in which popular music interacts with 
political and social factors. For this reason I do not provide any textual or musical 
analysis of the music under discussion.« (p. 7) Although I can understand that, at some 
points, quoting literary and musical sources is not necessary (for instance when Stroud 
approaches the role of the music industry or the State’s intervention in his considera-
tion of music as a cultural phenomenon), I believe that musical categories as sensitive 
as the ones mentioned transversely in this book (as well as the problematic concepts of 
popular music, traditional, authentic, popularesca or even brega, with the subjective 
and impressionistic meaning that some carry) would require paying more scientific 
attention to the fulcrum of this study, music – let it not be forgotten – which has a 
particular language and a metalanguage. 
However, we must not underestimate the contribution of The Defence of Tradition 
in Brazilian Popular Music to the understanding of the relationship between Brazilian 
popular music and its political, cultural and social environment – that has been exten-
                                              
45 See, for further information about aims, expectations and results, the project web 
site http://www.itaucultural.org.br/index.cfm?cd_pagina=2691, accessed 06.07. 
2011. 
Rezensionen – Reviews 
351 
sively modified in the last decades. On the contrary, this work, the result of an honest 
research backed with excellent bibliography and remarkable direct sources (not so 
much for musical sources, though), sketches a line of thinking surprisingly exempt and 
apart from the mainstream path in the scene of Brazilian popular music so far, which 
is worth mentioning. It would be desirable, and I sustain that desire, that further re-
search should undertake the leads hinted at in Stroud’s work, and tackle, complete, 
and revise accurately the many theoretical problems that appear in the book.  
I would like to raise two final questions related to musicology (although other dis-
ciplines could also be mentioned) brought about by my reading of this book. In the 
first place, I would consider the revision of the concept of MPB nowadays important 
enough to give rise to a particular study, but Stroud dedicates only a few short para-
graphs to it. How can we musically define MPB? Which are the common features 
(concerning its poetical and musical language) of the corpus canonically classified as 
MPB? Is it now a crystallised music genre? What happened to the political dimension 
assumed by MPB during the dictatorship years? Did other popular genres assume this 
dimension instead of MPB? Or is the idea itself of MPB that must be updated by 
welcoming non canonic interpreters and songs? Finally, I must disagree with the use of 
subjective classifications such as brega or authentic music, which are mere impression-
istic terms, to classify a music genre, because there are certainly enough musical and 
literary trends to mention and define these musical styles. From the musicological 
point of view, it is definitely an interesting path and Stroud’s work is a good starting 
point. 
Sandra Boto, Lissabon 
Suppan, Wolfgang: Steirisches Musiklexikon. 2. völlig überarbeitete und erweiterte 
Auflage. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 2009. XII, 804 S., ISBN 
978-3-20101-888-3. 
In dreierlei Bedeutung könne von der Musik eines Landes die Rede sein, schreibt 
Viktor Zuckerkandl, als Schauplatz für Musik, als Quelle insofern, als Menschen man-
ches, was sie zu sagen hätten, nicht anders als in Tönen sagen könnten und schließlich 
als Schöpfung im doppelten Sinne: »Musik als Schöpfung des Landes, das Land als 
Schöpfung der Musik«46. Einen Textausschnitt davon stellt Wolfgang Suppan pro-
grammatisch der neuen Auflage des Steirischen Musiklexikons voran (S. V). Suppan 
arbeitete ab 1963 am Deutschen Volksliedarchiv in Freiburg und wurde 1974 als 
Ordinarius für Musikethnologie an die damalige Hochschule für Musik und darstel-
lende Kunst nach Graz berufen. Seit nunmehr fünf Jahrzehnten prägt er solcherart 
Musikethnologie und Volksliedforschung und setzte am Grazer Institut für Musiketh-
nologie damals neue thematische Akzente: Neben europäischer und vergleichender 
Volkslied- und Volksmusikforschung oder Anthropologie der Musik gehörte dazu 
auch die landeskundliche Musikforschung in der Steiermark. 
                                              
46 Zuckerkandl, Viktor: Das Österreichische in der Musik. In: Speculum Austriae. 
Hg. von Otto Schulmeister. Wien 1957, S. 524–553. 


Universidade do Algarve

https://sapientia.ualg.pt/bitstream/10400.1/2114/1/Boto_Brazilian_S-1.348-351.pdf

Stroud, sean: the defence of tradition in Brazilian popular music. Politics, culture and the creation of música popular brasileira.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Sapientia (Univ. do Algarve)

Estudo Geral

Universidade do Algarve

Estudo Geral