$^{18}$F-Fluoride and $^{18}$F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: Case-Control Study.

Al-Shahi Salman, R; Clark, T; Davenport, AP; Dennis, M; Dweck, MR; Fletcher, A; Forsythe, RO; Irkle, A; Jenkins, WSA; Lucatelli, C; Mills, NL; Moss, A; Newby, DE; Roberts, G; Rudd, JHF; Sng, G; van Beek, EJR; Vesey, AT; Whiteley, WN

$^{18}$ F-Fluoride and $^{18}$ F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: Case-Control Study.

Authors: R Al-Shahi Salman
T Clark
AP Davenport
M Dennis
MR Dweck
A Fletcher
RO Forsythe
A Irkle
WSA Jenkins
C Lucatelli
NL Mills
A Moss
DE Newby
G Roberts
JHF Rudd
G Sng
EJR van Beek
AT Vesey
WN Whiteley
Publication date: 14 March 2017
Publisher: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Doi

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) can assess both anatomy and biology of carotid atherosclerosis. We sought to assess whether

^{18}

F-fluoride or

^{18}

F-fluorodeoxyglucose can identify culprit and high-risk carotid plaque. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed

^{18}

F-fluoride and

^{18}

F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in 26 patients after recent transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: 18 patients with culprit carotid stenosis awaiting carotid endarterectomy and 8 controls without culprit carotid atheroma. We compared standardized uptake values in the clinically adjudicated culprit to the contralateral asymptomatic artery, and assessed the relationship between radiotracer uptake and plaque phenotype or predicted cardiovascular risk (ASSIGN score [Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Using SIGN Guidelines to Assign Preventive Treatment]). We also performed micro PET/CT and histological analysis of excised plaque. On histological and micro PET/CT analysis,

^{18}

F-fluoride selectively highlighted microcalcification. Carotid

^{18}

F-fluoride uptake was increased in clinically adjudicated culprit plaques compared with asymptomatic contralateral plaques (log

_{10}

standardized uptake value

_{mean}

0.29±0.10 versus 0.23±0.11, P=0.001) and compared with control patients (log

_{10}

standardized uptake value

_{mean}

0.29±0.10 versus 0.12±0.11, P=0.001).

^{18}

F-Fluoride uptake correlated with high-risk plaque features (remodeling index [r=0.53, P=0.003], plaque burden [r=0.51, P=0.004]), and predicted cardiovascular risk [r=0.65, P=0.002]). Carotid

^{18}

F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake appeared to be increased in 7 of 16 culprit plaques, but no overall differences in uptake were observed in culprit versus contralateral plaques or control patients. However,

^{18}

F-fluorodeoxyglucose did correlate with predicted cardiovascular risk (r=0.53, P=0.019), but not with plaque phenotype. CONCLUSIONS:

^{18}

F-Fluoride PET/CT highlights culprit and phenotypically high-risk carotid plaque. This has the potential to improve risk stratification and selection of patients who may benefit from intervention.Dr Vesey and the study were funded by program grants from the British Heart Foundation (PG12/8/29371) and Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland (R13/A147). Dr Jenkins, Vesey, Dweck, and Newby are supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/14/78/31020, CH/09/002) and the Wellcome Trust (WT103782AIA). Dr Dweck is the recipient of the Sir Jules Thorn Biomedical Research Award 2015. The Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility and the Clinical Research Imaging Centre are supported by National Health Service (NHS) Research Scotland (NRS) through NHS Lothian. Dr Beek is supported by the Scottish Imaging Network—a Platform of Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE). Dr Rudd is part-supported by the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, the British Heart Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust