The impact of convection on tropospheric O3 and its precursors has been examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that convection affects O3. First, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions where the O3 lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes O3-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the O3 lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT O3 and the overall tropospheric column of O3. Secondly, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 precursors. This affects O3 chemical production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NOx to produce PAN, at the expense of NOx. In our model, we find that convection reduces UT NOx through this mechanism; convective down-mixing also flattens our imposed profile of lightning emissions, further reducing UT NOx. Over tropical land, which has large lightning NOx emissions in the UT, we find convective lofting of NOx from surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NOx decreases, UT O3 production increases as a result of UT HOx increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O3 tends to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O3 itself dominates over changes in O3 chemistry. Convective transport also reduces UT O3 in the mid-latitudes resulting in a 13% decrease in the global tropospheric O3 burden. These results contrast with an earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences in convection schemes as well as chemistry schemes &ndash; in particular isoprene-driven changes are the most likely causes of such discrepancies. Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range

Collins, W. J.

Doherty, R. M.

Sanderson, M. G.

Stevenson, D. S.

English

Crossref

Influence of convective transport on tropospheric ozone and its precursors in a chemistry-climate model

International audienceThe impact of convection on tropospheric O3 and its precursors has been examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that convection affects O3. First, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions where the O3 lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes O3-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the O3 lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT O3 and the overall tropospheric column of O3. Secondly, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 precursors. This affects O3 chemical production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NOx to produce PAN, at the expense of NOx. In our model, we find that convection reduces UT NOx through this mechanism; convective down-mixing also flattens our imposed profile of lightning emissions, further reducing UT NOx. Over tropical land, which has large lightning NOx emissions in the UT, we find convective lofting of NOx from surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NOx decreases, UT O3 production increases as a result of UT HOx increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O3 tends to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O3 itself dominates over changes in O3 chemistry. Convective transport also reduces UT O3 in the mid-latitudes resulting in a 13% decrease in the global tropospheric O3 burden. These results contrast with an earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences in convection schemes as well as chemistry schemes ? in particular isoprene-driven changes are the most likely causes of such discrepancies. Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range

HAL-INSU

International audienceThe impact of convection on tropospheric O3 and its precursors has been examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that convection affects O3. First, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions where the ozone lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes O3-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the O3 lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT ozone and the overall tropospheric column of O3. Secondly, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of ozone precursors. This affects O3 chemical production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NOx to produce PAN, at the expense of NOx. The combined effect of NOx to PAN conversions and downward transport of lightning NOx results in UT NOx decreases. Convective lofting of NOx from surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NOx decreases, UT O3 production increases as a result of UT HOx increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O3 tends to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O3 itself dominates over changes in O3 chemistry. The changes in tropical UT O3 are transported polewards resulting in a 15% decrease in the global tropospheric O3 burden. These results contrast with an earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences in chemistry schemes - in particular isoprene-driven changes, as well as differences in convection schemes themselves, are the most likely causes of such discrepancies. Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range

The impact of convection on tropospheric O3 and its precursors has been examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that convection affects O3. First, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions where the O3 lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes O3-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the O3 lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT O3 and the overall tropospheric column of O3. Secondly, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 precursors. This affects O3 chemical production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NOx to produce PAN, at the expense of NOx. In our model, we find that convection reduces UT NOx through this mechanism; convective down-mixing also flattens our imposed profile of lightning emissions, further reducing UT NOx. Over tropical land, which has large lightning NOx emissions in the UT, we find convective lofting of NOx from surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NOx decreases, UT O3 production increases as a result of UT HOx increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O3 tends to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O3 itself dominates over changes in O3 chemistry. Convective transport also reduces UT O3 in the mid-latitudes resulting in a 13% decrease in the global tropospheric O3 burden. These results contrast with an earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences in convection schemes as well as chemistry schemes – in particular isoprene-driven changes are the most likely causes of such discrepancies. Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range

Edinburgh Research Explorer

A 4-dimensional ozone climatology for UGAMP models, UGAMP internal report,

A comprehensive mass ﬂux scheme for cumulus convection in large-scale models,

A global model of natural organic comwww.atmos-chem-phys.org/acp/5/3205/

A model for studies of tropospheric ozone and non-methane hydrocarbons: Model description and ozone results,

A persistent imbalance in HOx and NOx photochemistry of the upper troposphere driven by deep tropical convection,

An estimate of the ﬂux of stratospheric reactive nitrogen and ozone into the troposphere,

Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, in: Climate Change 2001: The Scientiﬁc Basis, Contribution of WG1 to the Third Assessment report of the IPCC, edited by:

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From air pollution to climate change,

Comparison between archived and off-line disgnosed convective mass ﬂuxes in the chemistry transport model TM3,

Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors,

Effect of climate change on isoprene emissions and surface ozone levels,

et al.: Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone,

Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector,

Impacts of climate change and variability on tropospheric ozone and its precursors,

IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios,

La Nina and El Nino – induced variabilities of ozone in the tropical lower atmosphere during 1970–2001,

Model Calculations of Tropospheric Ozone Production Potential Following Observed Convective Events,

Modelling studies of boundary-layer to free troposphere exchange, in:

NOx from lightning 1. Global distribution based on lightning physics,

Parametrization of momentum transport by convection. II: Tests in single-column and general circulation models,

Projections of future climate change, in: Climate Change 2001: The Scientiﬁc Basis, Contribution of WG1 to the Third Assessment report of the IPCC, edited by:

Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere,

Representations of transport, convection, and the hydrologic cycle in chemical transport models: Implications for the modeling of short-lived and soluble species,

Role of convection in determining the budget of odd hydrogen in the upper troposphere,

Role of deep cloud convection in the ozone budget of the troposphere,

Sensitivities in global scale modeling of isoprene,

Simulation of global hydrogen levels using a Lagrangian three-dimensional model,

The balance of effects of deep convective mixing on tropospheric ozone,

The effects of lightning-produced NOx and its vertical distribution on atmospheric chemistry: sensitivity simulations with MATCHMPIC,

The impact of air pollutant and methane emission controls on tropospheric ozone and radiative forcing: CTM calculations for the period 1990–2030,

The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model:

Thunderstorms – an important mechanism in the transport of air pollutants,

Vertical distributions of lightning NOx for use in regional and global chemical transport models,

Vertical transport by convective clouds: Comparisons of three modeling approaches,

The impact of convection on tropospheric O3 and its precursors has been examined in a coupled chemistry-climate model. There are two ways that convection affects O3. First, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 itself. Convection lifts lower tropospheric air to regions where the O3 lifetime is longer, whilst mass-balance subsidence mixes O3-rich upper tropospheric (UT) air downwards to regions where the O3 lifetime is shorter. This tends to decrease UT O3 and the overall tropospheric column of O3. Secondly, convection affects O3 by vertical mixing of O3 precursors. This affects O3 chemical production and destruction. Convection transports isoprene and its degradation products to the UT where they interact with lightning NOx to produce PAN, at the expense of NOx. In our model, we find that convection reduces UT NOx through this mechanism; convective down-mixing also flattens our imposed profile of lightning emissions, further reducing UT NOx. Over tropical land, which has large lightning NOx emissions in the UT, we find convective lofting of NOx from surface sources appears relatively unimportant. Despite UT NOx decreases, UT O3 production increases as a result of UT HOx increases driven by isoprene oxidation chemistry. However, UT O3 tends to decrease, as the effect of convective overturning of O3 itself dominates over changes in O3 chemistry. Convective transport also reduces UT O3 in the mid-latitudes resulting in a 13% decrease in the global tropospheric O3 burden. These results contrast with an earlier study that uses a model of similar chemical complexity. Differences in convection schemes as well as chemistry schemes &ndash; in particular isoprene-driven changes are the most likely causes of such discrepancies. Further modelling studies are needed to constrain this uncertainty range

Influence of convective transport on tropospheric ozone and its precursors in a chemistry-climate model

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

HAL-INSU

HAL-INSU

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Directory of Open Access Journals