ACPO

Drury

Gorringe

Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary

Holgersson

Home Affairs Select Committee

McSeveny

Reicher

Rosie

Stott

Tyler

Waddington

Wahlström

Following the major riots within England in August 2011, the efficacy of public order police decision making was brought into a sharp focus. None the less, the reform of this mode of policing within the UK was already underway with a strong emphasis upon policing through consent and the need to facilitate peaceful protest through dialogue and communication. This paper reports upon a critical ‘test case’ for this ‘new approach’ by analysing the policing of a series of protests against Government policy across 3 days that surrounded a Government party conference in Sheffield, a large city in the north of England. This paper draws out lessons to be learned from what proved to be a highly successful dialogue-based approach to policing protests. We contend that dialogue and liaison were effective because they allowed for an ongoing dynamic risk assessment that improved command-level decision making and enhanced police proportionality. The subsequent impact upon crowd dynamics allowed for an improved capacity for proactive public order management, encouraged ‘self-regulation’ in the crowd, and avoided the unnecessary police use of force at moments of tension. The implications of the analysis for theory and practice are discussed

Gorringe, Hugo

Stott, Clifford

Rosie, Michael

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Dialogue Police, Decision Making, and the Management of Public Order During Protest Crowd Events

Dialogue Police, Decision Making, and the Management of Public Order During Protest Crowd Events

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Crossref