Texas is one of twelve states that has chosen not to expand Medicaid, despite having the largest number of uninsured residents in the country. Ninety percent matching financing from the federal government means the state is missing out on not only any benefits to individuals but fiscal benefits to local economies. This policy brief summarizes research on fiscal impacts of Medicaid expansion and the number of Texans who would be eligible for expansion, as well as how much new federal annual spending would be expected if those Texans enrolled in Medicaid. The research was sponsored by the Episcopal Health Foundation, a philanthropic organization focused on improving community health in Texas. The full report, “County-Level Projections of Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas,” can be found on their website and includes county-level data, interactive embeddable maps that show potential funding and health insurance coverage for every county in Texas, and complete details about the project’s methods.Episcopal Health Foundatio

Dague, Laura

English

Texas A&M University

Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas

Texas A&amp;M Repository

Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas  LAURA DAGUE & CONSTANCE HUGHES The Bush School of Government and Public Service VOLUME 11 | ISSUE 12 | SEPTEMBER 2020 http://bush.tamu.edu/mosbacher/takeaway The Takeaway © Mosbacher Institute Texas is one of twelve states that has chosen not to expand Medicaid, despite having the largest number of uninsured residents in the country. Ninety percent matching financ-ing from the federal government means the state is miss-ing out on not only any benefits to individuals but fiscal benefits to local economies. In this brief, we summarize research on fiscal impacts of Medicaid expansion and the number of Texans who would be eligible for expansion, as well as how much new federal annual spending would be expected if those Texans enrolled in Medicaid.  In Texas, adults without dependents or disabilities are not eligible for Medicaid regardless of income, and parents of de-pendent children are eligible only up to about $251 in income per month for a family of 3 with two parents. That means Tex-as currently has a large gap between Medicaid eligibility and eligibility for federally subsidized private Marketplace plans, WHAT’S THE TAKEAWAY?  Texas has the largest number of uninsured residents of any state, but has opted out of expanding Medicaid. Medicaid can serve as an automatic stabilizer providing federal dollars to states during times of downturns. At current funding rates, Medicaid expansion could bring $5.4 billion in new federal dollars to Texas. Medicaid expansion could provide the security of health insurance to nearly one million low-income Texans with little cost to the state. 2 which begin at an income of about $1,810 per month for a family of three. So, many adults in poor working families make too much money for Medicaid, but not enough to qualify for a federal subsidy much less purchase unsubsi-dized private insurance. Partly as a result of this policy choice, 5 million Texans represent-ing 17.7% of the population were uninsured as of 2018, more than twice the national aver-age uninsured rate.  Popularity of the main tenets of the Afforda-ble Care Act’s (ACA) has continued to grow, and many states that were initially not eager to participate in the Medicaid expansion have changed their minds. Voters in Texas reflect these trends. In 2019, 59% of Texans report-ed believing the legislature is not doing enough to help low-income adults access health care.1 A majority (57%) supported ex-panding access to health insurance as a top priority of the legislature, presumably through expanding Medicaid which stands at 64% support. State legislators are accounta-ble to stakeholders in their local districts. Many health-related programs are adminis-tered and financed at the county level and supported through local funds, such as indi-gent healthcare programs mandated by the state through counties, hospital districts, and public hospitals, so considering the impact of expansion on local economies is particularly important.  FISCAL IMPLICATIONS OF MEDICAID  EXPANSION Since it began in 1965, Medicaid has been jointly financed between the federal and state governments. States receive a matching grant from the federal government to finance their individual state programs that depends on their per capita income. As of 2020, Medicaid expansions are financed at a rate of 90%, so the state share is just 10%; by putting up just ten cents the state can bring down 90 cents in federal dollars.  The total fiscal impact is more than just this sticker price, however, since there may be ad-ditional offsets or expenses that result from the expansion. The state can offset some ex-penses because some individuals who were previously eligible under other Medicaid pro-grams for special circumstances will enroll under the expansion instead. The state can also expect less spending on health care fund-ed under programs for mental health and sub-stance use treatment, some corrections-related health care, and provider subsidies for uncompensated care. Finally, the increased federal spending may have stimulus effects as typically associated with increased economic activity.  Reports from states that have expanded Medi-caid, as well as new research, suggest that ex-pansion under the ACA’s financing terms can occur with marginal state budget impact.2, 3  For example, despite a 24% increase in aver-age Medicaid spending, states saw less than a 1% increase in their own spending, without reductions in other budget areas. Several states funded their expansions completely out of non-general fund sources, including provid-er taxes, and at least one state saw the need for existing county-level safety net programs completely replaced by Medicaid expansion.4 ESTIMATES OF EXPANSION’S IMPACT Our estimates of eligibility and enrollment are based on the Census Bureau’s American Com-Dague & Hughes | Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas | Volume 11 | Issue 12 | September 2020 munity Survey (ACS), an annual survey repre-sentative of the US population and states.5 The most recent available data are from 2018, so we project the calculations to 2020 using the statewide population estimate from the Texas Demographic Center.   We estimate that there are roughly 1.4 million uninsured Texans ages 19-64 whose income and family status are in the range for a Medi-caid expansion, and an additional 103,000 Marketplace enrollees who could become eli-gible instead for Medicaid. After adjusting for immigration-related eligibility restrictions, we estimate that approximately 1,274,000 people are likely to be newly eligible for Medi-caid benefits under an expansion in 2020. As-suming a take-up rate of 73% among the un-insured and that 95% of current Marketplace enrollees will enroll, we estimate new Medi-caid enrollment of 954,000 Texans. At an esti-mated cost of $525 per enrollee per month, the annual federal dollars brought to Texas would be $5.41 billion with a state share (before any savings and offsets) of just over $600 million.  WHAT ABOUT COVID-19? We are currently in the grips of a major eco-nomic downturn associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. This downturn will likely mean significantly higher Medicaid enrollment in the short-run in an expansion than these pro-jections suggest. We have based our analysis on pre-COVID data, which likely best repre-sent the long-term enrollment scenario.  As a result of the pandemic, state and local governments are struggling with their budg-ets, which in Texas rely heavily on sales, prop-erty, and oil and gas taxes. The idea of spend-ing more state dollars on such a program in a recession may seem counterintuitive. Howev-er, Medicaid can serve as an automatic stabi-lizer bringing federal dollars to states during times of downturns—as state needs increase because of higher enrollment or spending, federal spending automatically increases pro-portionately, if the state can fund its addition-al share.6 This is particularly important for the health care sector, as financial pressure on local health systems is high after mandated delays of non-emergent procedures and lower demand for services as fear of the virus led people to stay home.  The pandemic may be an opportunity for the state to better position itself to weather this and future crises be-cause the federal government can cover a large portion of the costs automatically through Medicaid.  3 Dague & Hughes | Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas | Volume 11 | Issue 12 | September 2020 CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion would bring $5.4 billion federal dollars to Texas, and more than 954,000 low-income Texans could gain the financial se-curity that comes with health insurance. The experience of other states shows that it is feasi-ble to implement an expansion with required state funding sourced in large part from budget offsets and provider taxes and very little gen-eral revenue. The potential fiscal benefits of expansion relative to its costs should be care-fully considered by decision-makers in Texas.  A more expansive version of these estimates, including county-level projections, as well as complete details on the methods, can be found in our full report.7  4 Dague & Hughes | Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas | Volume 11 | Issue 12 | September 2020 ABOUT THE MOSBACHER INSTITUTE The Mosbacher Institute was founded in 2009 to honor Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce from 1989-1992 and key architect of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Through our four core focus areas–Global Markets and Trade, Borders and Migration, Energy, and Governance and Public Services–our objective is to advance the design of policies for tomorrow’s challenges. Contact: Cynthia Gause, Program Coordinator Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy  Bush School of Government and Public Service 4220 TAMU, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843-4220 Email: bushschoolmosbacher@tamu.edu  Website: http://bush.tamu.edu/mosbacher The views expressed here are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Mosbacher Institute, a center for independent, nonpartisan academic and policy research, nor of the Bush School of Government and Public Service.  To share your thoughts on The Takeaway, please visit  http://bit.ly/1ABajdH  Constance Hughes is a Master’s Candidate in Public Service and Administration at the Bush School of Government and Public Service.  Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for funding for the work reflected in this brief from the Episcopal Health Foundation. All views are our own.  Notes: 1 New EHF Texas health policy poll: Texans show sweeping support for protections for pre-existing conditions (2019, March). Episcopal Health Foundation. https://www.episcopalhealth.org/enews/new-ehf-health-policy-poll-texans-show-sweeping-support-protections-pre-existing-conditions/ 2 Gruber, J. & Sommers, B. (2020, March). Fiscal federalism and the budget impacts of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. NBER Working Paper 26862. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26862 3 Ward, B. (2020, May). The Impact of Medicaid expansion on states’ budgets. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2020/may/impact-medicaid-expansion-states-budgets  4 Duggan, M., Gupta, A. & Jackson, E. (2019, January). The impact of the Affordable Care Act: Evidence from California’s hospital sector,” NBER Working Paper 25488.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w25488 5 We use the ACS microdata harmonized and made available by IPUMS USA, University of Minnesota, www.ipums.org. 6 Forbes, M. & Park, C. (2020, June). Considerations for countercyclical financing adjustments in Medicaid. https://www.macpac.gov/publication/considerations-for-countercyclical-financing-adjustments-in-medicaid/  7 Dague, L. & Hughes, C. (2020, September). County-level projections of Medicaid expansion’s impact in Texas.  https://www.episcopalhealth.org/research-report/county-level-projections-of-medicaid-expansions-impact-in-texas/ Laura Dague, PhD, is Associate Professor of Public Service and Administration in Texas A&M’s Bush School of Government and Public Service, a Mosbacher Research Fellow, and a Research Associate in the National Bureau of Economic Research’s Health Economics program. She studies the effects of Medicaid expansions and has served as an investigator for multiple Medicaid waiver evaluations.  

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/1969.1/189350/1/V11-12_Texas_Medicaid_Expansion_Takeaway.pdf

Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M Repository

Medicaid Expansion’s Impact in Texas

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Texas A&M University

Texas A&amp;M Repository

Texas A&M Repository