The paper aims to explore the contour of internet regulation with a thread of
Brand X , which navigates through constitutionalism, separation of powers, as
well as business and economic or political implications enshrined behind it.
An exemplary insight with the Korean case was adverted that could lead to the
comparative perspective of internet law and regulation for the future research.
The research was conducted by employing qualitative investigation, mainly
relying on textual analysis and documentary examination. The outcome of
research generally corroborates with our assumption that i) the increasing
administrative state will variegate the traditional interplay of three branches,
ii) expert bureaucracy stands at the core of policy shaping because of the necessary
new concept of market and policy specialization, iii) the role of US
government is not only pioneering, but also influential as a regulator, but
comparatively with differing national jurisdictions if not a negligible implications
on the international competition or even conflict
