CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Management of atraumatic shoulder instability in physiotherapy (MASIP): a survey of physiotherapy practice
Authors
Mindy Cairns
Caroline Coulthard
+3 more
Ben Hughes
Anju Jaggi
Deborah Williams
Publication date
1 September 2021
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Background: The impact of atraumatic shoulder instability (ASI) on patients can be extensive, its management complex, with a biopsychosocial approach recommended. Currently how physiotherapists manage ASI is unknown or the extent to which current clinical practice aligns with existing evidence. At the time of this study no national guidelines or consensus to direct practice existed. Methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed between July-September 2018, targeting UK-based physiotherapists managing shoulder pathology. Respondents were invited to describe their management of ASI, and rate their awareness and utilisation of various treatment techniques on a Likert-scale; median and interquartile ranges were calculated. Free text survey items were analysed using quantitative content analysis (QCA) to identify codes and categories. Means and percentages were calculated to summarise QCA and descriptive data. Results: Valid survey responses were analysed (n = 135). Respondents had between 2 and 39 years of physiotherapy experience (mean = 13.9 years); the majority (71.1 %) reported that ASI made up 90 % citing the Stanmore Classification. Physiotherapists adapted their management according to clinical presentation, responding to differing biopsychosocial needs of the patient scenario. Most respondents (> 80 %) did not use a protocol to guide their management. Exercise was the most utilised management approach for ASI, followed by education; novel treatment strategies, including cortical rehabilitation, were also reported. Conclusion: Findings indicate physiotherapists utilise a wide range of treatment strategies and respond to biopsychosocial cues when managing patients with ASI. The majority reported not being very confident in managing this condition, however only a minority use rehabilitation protocols to support their management. Some interventions that respondents reported using lacked evidence to support their use in ASI management and further research regarding effectiveness is required. Guidelines have been published since this survey; the impact of these will need evaluating to determine their effectiveness in the future.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of Hertfordshire Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uhra.herts.ac.uk:2299/2509...
Last time updated on 06/11/2021
Directory of Open Access Journals
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:doaj.org/article:29ba65f71...
Last time updated on 22/12/2021