CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Registered reports: an early example and analysis
Authors
Akers
Alcock
+52 more
Bem
Blackmore
Bösch
Carey
Center for Open Science
Chambers
Chambers
Chambers
Dickerson
Easterbrook
Fisher
Francis
Hacking
Halliwell
Jahn
John
Johnson
Johnson
Johnson
Kaplan
Kaptchuk
Kennedy
Kupfersmid
LeBel
Milton
Milton
Neuroskeptic
Neuroskeptic
Neuroskeptic
Neuroskeptic
Newcombe
Nosek
Nosek
Open Science Collaboration
Parker
Pashler
Rhine
Ritchie
Rosenthal
Rosenthal
Schimmack
Schouten
Simes
Solfvin
Van ‘t Veer
Wagenmakers
Wagenmakers
Walster
Watt
Watt
Weiss
Wiklund
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
'PeerJ'
Doi
Abstract
© 2019 Wiseman et al.The recent ‘replication crisis’ in psychology has focused attention on ways of increasing methodological rigor within the behavioral sciences. Part of this work has involved promoting ‘Registered Reports’, wherein journals peer review papers prior to data collection and publication. Although this approach is usually seen as a relatively recent development, we note that a prototype of this publishing model was initiated in the mid-1970s by parapsychologist Martin Johnson in the European Journal of Parapsychology (EJP). A retrospective and observational comparison of Registered and non-Registered Reports published in the EJP during a seventeen-year period provides circumstantial evidence to suggest that the approach helped to reduce questionable research practices. This paper aims both to bring Johnson’s pioneering work to a wider audience, and to investigate the positive role that Registered Reports may play in helping to promote higher methodological and statistical standards.Peer reviewe
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 10/12/2019
Edinburgh Research Explorer
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.ed.ac.uk:openaire/909...
Last time updated on 20/11/2025
Directory of Open Access Journals
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:doaj.org/article:a9f7dfe19...
Last time updated on 04/06/2019
Edinburgh Research Explorer
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.ed.ac.uk:publications...
Last time updated on 05/04/2019
University of Hertfordshire Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uhra.herts.ac.uk:7632
Last time updated on 02/07/2025