Rating Communication in GP Consultations: The Association Between Ratings Made by Patients and Trained Clinical Raters.

Abstract

Patient evaluations of physician communication are widely used, but we know little about how these relate to professionally agreed norms of communication quality. We report an investigation into the association between patient assessments of communication quality and an observer-rated measure of communication competence. Consent was obtained to video record consultations with Family Practitioners in England, following which patients rated the physician's communication skills. A sample of consultation videos was subsequently evaluated by trained clinical raters using an instrument derived from the Calgary-Cambridge guide to the medical interview. Consultations scored highly for communication by clinical raters were also scored highly by patients. However, when clinical raters judged communication to be of lower quality, patient scores ranged from "poor" to "very good." Some patients may be inhibited from rating poor communication negatively. Patient evaluations can be useful for measuring relative performance of physicians' communication skills, but absolute scores should be interpreted with caution.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by a National Institute for Health Research Programme Grant for Applied Research (NIHR PGfAR) program (RP-PG-0608-10050).This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from SAGE via http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107755871667121