Kadison, E.

Martens, J.

Nemeth, R.

Rhodes, K.

English

Aquatic Commons

Proceedings of the 65th Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute                  November 5 – 9, 2012   Santa Marta, Colombia 
Conservation and Management of Grouper Spawning Aggregation Sites:  
Adaptive Strategies Based on Fish Movement Patterns   
 
Conservación y Gestión de los Sitios de Agregación para el Desove de Meros:  
Estrategias de Adaptación Basadas en los Patrones de Movimiento de Peces 
 
Conservation et Gestion des Sites de Frai de Loches:  
Stratégies d'Adaptation Basées sur les Habitudes de Déplacement des Poissons 
 
RICHARD S. NEMETH1, KEVIN RHODES2, ELIZABETH KADISON1, and JUSTIN MARTENS1 
1University of the Virgin Islands, Center for Marine and Environmental Studies, St. Thomas,  
US Virgin Islands 00802. *rnemeth@uvi.edu. 2University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720 USA 
 
EXTENDED ABSTRACT 
Most large groupers (Serranidae) form annual fish spawning aggregations (FSA) at predictable times and locations 
(Domeier and Colin 1997); a life-history trait that makes them extremely vulnerable to over-fishing (Sadovy de Mitcheson 
et al. 2008). Seasonal or permanent fishery area closures can provide effective protection (Nemeth 2005), but defining 
biologically relevant boundaries is difficult due to limited knowledge of the movement and migration patterns associated 
with spawning. The aim of this study was to compare the spatial and temporal patterns of movement and migration of 
groupers at spawning aggregations in the Caribbean and Pacific.  
 
METHODS 
This study was carried out between January 2010 and April 2012 at two FSA sites located in the Caribbean and Pacific. 
The Grammanik Bank is a 1.5 km2 seasonally protected area located 12 km south of St. Thomas, United States Virgin 
Islands. Several species of groupers and snappers form annual spawning aggregations from January through May each year 
(Nemeth et al. 2006). The second study site was located on the outer barrier reef of Pohnpei, Micronesia in the Kehpara 
Marine Reserve and also contains FSAs for several species of Pacific groupers (Rhodes and Sadovy 2002) which aggregate 
from January through April. In St. Thomas Epinephelus striatus, E. guttatus, Mycteroperca venenosa, and M. tigris were 
captured using Antillian fish traps baited with squid, drop nets or hand lines. In Pohnpei Epinephelus polyphekadion, E. 
fuscoguttatus and Plectropomus areolatus were captured with baited hand lines. Captured groupers were surgically 
implanted with acoustic transmitters (Vemco V9 and V13) and movements were tracked using a large array of 40 acoustic 
receivers (Vemco VR2W) that were strategically placed around each FSA site.  Receivers were moored using either a 
stainless steel cable shackled to a large coral head or polypropylene line attached to a concrete base.  
 
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
Acoustic data of fish movement patterns indicated that distance travelled was positively related to fish length and that 
these species commonly swam 1 to 3 km in a few hours and could cover 15 km or more in a 24 hour period. Some differ-
ences in spatial patterns of movement were detected between reef types in the Caribbean and Pacific. For example, the 
Grammanik Bank is surrounded by the extensive Puerto Rican plateau which allowed grouper to swim over very large areas 
surrounding the FSA site. In contrast, the movements of groupers in Pohnpei were constrained by the barrier reef which 
restricted grouper to swim along linear migration pathways following the contour of the barrier reef and only allowing 
access to the inner lagoon via reef passages. In most cases, however, movements of tagged groupers in both locations 
carried them outside the existing protected area boundaries and exposed them to fishing mortality on a daily basis. We 
found a positive relationship (r2 = 0.78, p < .02) between fish size and area utilized during spawning season. General area 
requirements were as follows: E. polyphekadion and P. areolatus (2 km2), M. tigris (3 km2), E. striatus and E. fuscoguttatus 
(5.5 km2) and M. venenosa (10 km2). Using information from this study we can recommend general guidelines for establish-
ing spatial requirements for each species around spawning aggregation sites which can greatly increase the efficiency of 
MPA design while minimizing the impact on fisher livelihoods.   
 
LITERATURE CITED 
Domeier, M.L. and P.L. Colin 1997. Tropical reef fish spawning aggregations: defined and reviewed. Bulletin of Marine Science 60:698-726. 
Nemeth, R.S. 2005. Population characteristics of a recovering US Virgin Islands red hind spawning aggregation following protection. Marine Ecology 
Progress Series 286:81-97. 
Nemeth, R.S., E. Kadison, S. Herzlieb, J. Blondeau, and E. Whiteman. 2006. Status of a yellowfin grouper (Mycteroperca venenosa) spawning aggregation 
in the US Virgin Islands with notes on other species. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute  57:543-558. 
Rhodes, K.L. and Y. Sadovy. 2002. Temporal and spatial trends in spawning aggregations of camouflage grouper, Epinephelus polyphekadion, in Pohnpei, 
Micronesia. Environmental Biology of Fish 63:27-39. 
Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y., A. Cornish, M. Domeier, P.L. Colin, M. Russell, and K. Lindeman. 2008. A global baseline for spawning aggregations of reef 
fishes. Conservation Biology 22:1233-1244. 


Conservation and Management of Grouper Spawning Aggregation Sites: Adaptive Strategies Based on Fish Movement Patterns

http://aquaticcommons.org/21505/1/GCFI_65-58.pdf

Conservation and Management of Grouper Spawning Aggregation Sites: Adaptive Strategies Based on Fish Movement Patterns

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Aquatic Commons