CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Frequency Characteristics of Visually Induced Motion Sickness
Authors
Bagshaw M.
Benson A. J.
+23 more
British Standards Institution
Bubka A.
Diels C.
Donohew B. E.
Golding J. F.
Golding J. F.
Golding J. F.
Golding J. F.
Griffin M. J.
Guignard J. C.
Hettinger L. J.
Hu S.
Kennedy R. S.
Lawson B.
Lin J. J. W.
Mach E.
Oman C. M.
O’Hanlon J. F.
Parker D. E.
Reason J. T.
Reed N.
Stanney K. M.
von Gierke H. E.
Publication date
1 January 2013
Publisher
'SAGE Publications'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
This article was published in the journal, Human Factors [Sage Publications / © Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812469046Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency response of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) for oscillating linear motion in the foreand- aft axis. Background: Simulators, virtual environments, and commercially available video games that create an illusion of self-motion are often reported to induce the symptoms seen in response to true motion. Often this human response can be the limiting factor in the acceptability and usability of such systems. Whereas motion sickness in physically moving environments is known to peak at an oscillation frequency around 0.2 Hz, it has recently been suggested that VIMS peaks at around 0.06 Hz following the proposal that the summed response of the visual and vestibular selfmotion systems is maximized at this frequency. Methods: We exposed 24 participants to random dot optical flow patterns simulating oscillating foreand- aft motion within the frequency range of 0.025 to 1.6 Hz. Before and after each 20-min exposure, VIMS was assessed with the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. Also, a standard motion sickness scale was used to rate symptoms at 1-min intervals during each trial. Results: VIMS peaked between 0.2 and 0.4 Hz with a reducing effect at lower and higher frequencies. Conclusion: The numerical prediction of the “crossover frequency” hypothesis, and the design guidance curve previously proposed, cannot be accepted when the symptoms are purely visually induced. Application: In conditions in which stationary observers are exposed to optical flow that simulates oscillating fore-and-aft motion, frequencies around 0.2 to 0.4 Hz should be avoided
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Loughborough University Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:figshare.com:article/93468...
Last time updated on 26/03/2020
Coventry University Pure Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire/9aa...
Last time updated on 25/11/2025
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1177%2F00187208124...
Last time updated on 03/12/2019
Coventry University Pure Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 16/10/2019