CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Systemic antifungal therapy for tinea capitis in children:An abridged Cochrane Review
Authors
Cathy Bennett
Xiaomei Chen
+7 more
Urbà González
Xia Hua
Xia Jiang
Xiufang Lin
Siliang Xue
Ming Yang
Min Zhang
Publication date
1 February 2017
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Abstract
BackgroundThe comparative efficacy and safety profiles of systemic antifungal drugs for tinea capitis in children remain unclear.ObjectiveWe sought to assess the effects of systemic antifungal drugs for tinea capitis in children.MethodsWe used standard Cochrane methodological procedures.ResultsWe included 25 randomized controlled trials with 4449 participants. Terbinafine and griseofulvin had similar effects for children with mixed Trichophyton and Microsporum infections (risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.24). Terbinafine was better than griseofulvin for complete cure of T tonsurans infections (risk ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.22-1.77); griseofulvin was better than terbinafine for complete cure of infections caused solely by Microsporum species (risk ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.86). Compared with griseofulvin or terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole had similar effects against Trichophyton infections.LimitationsAll included studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. Lower quality evidence resulted in a lower confidence in the estimate of effect. Significant clinical heterogeneity existed across studies.ConclusionsGriseofulvin or terbinafine are both effective; terbinafine is more effective for T tonsurans and griseofulvin for M canis infections. Itraconazole and fluconazole are alternative but not optimal choices for Trichophyton infections. Optimal regimens of antifungal agents need further studies.Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, [76, 2, (2017)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.08.061© 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/<br/
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jaad.2016...
Last time updated on 10/01/2021
Coventry University Pure Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 16/10/2019
Coventry University Pure Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire/c42...
Last time updated on 25/11/2025