Bearn, David R.

El-Angbawi, Ahmed M.

McIntyre, Grant T.

Revie, Gavin F.

Yassir, Yassir A.

European Journal of Orthodontics

Objective: To compare orthodontically induced inflammatory root resoprtion (OIIRR) and patient perception of pain during orthodontic treatment between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems. Subjects and methods: Eligible participants aged 12 years or over were allocated to treatment with the 0.018-inch or 0.022-inch slot MBT appliance (3M-Unitek, Monrovia, California) using block randomisation in groups of ten. OIIRR was assessed radiographically using standardised periapical radiographs before and after 9 months from the start of treatment. Patient perception of pain was assessed using a validated patient questionnaire at 6 months from the start of treatment. Parametric tests (t-test) and non-parametric tests (Chi-square with Fisher’s exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis test) assessed differences between the groups (P &lt; 0.05). The correlation between severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology, history of dental trauma, and pain during treatment was assessed. Results: Of the 187 participants randomised (1:1 ratio), 34 withdrew or were excluded (protocol deviations or poor cooperation). There were 77 patients in the 0.018-inch slot group and 76 patients in the 0.022-inch slot group (overall mean age: 19.1 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the severity of the OIIRR nor patient perception of pain between the two study groups (P=0.115 and P= 0.08 respectively). The correlation between the severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology or history of dental trauma was not statistically significant (P=0.086 and P=0.313). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between the severity of OIIRR and pain during treatment (R= 0.045, P=0.617). Limitations: It was impossible to blind clinicians or patients to allocation and oral hygiene and periodontal outcomes were not assessed. Conclusions: The effect of bracket slot size on the on the severity of OIIRR and patient perception of pain is not significant

University of Dundee Online Publications

A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems:part 3 - biological side-effects of treatment

Ahmed M El-Angbawi

Yassir A Yassir

Grant T McIntyre

Gavin F Revie

David R Bearn

Crossref

A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 3—biological side-effects of treatment

Summary Objective To compare orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) and patient perception of pain during orthodontic treatment between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems. Subjects and methods Eligible participants aged 12 years or above were allocated to treatment with the 0.018-inch or 0.022-inch slot MBT appliance (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) using block randomization in groups of 10. OIIRR was assessed radiographically using standardized periapical radiographs before and after 9 months from the start of treatment. Patient perception of pain was assessed using a validated patient questionnaire at 6 months from the start of treatment. Parametric tests (t-test) and non-parametric tests (chi-square with Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis test) assessed differences between the groups (P &lt; 0.05). The correlation between severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology, history of dental trauma, and pain during treatment was assessed. Results Of the 187 participants randomized (1:1 ratio), 34 withdrew or were excluded (protocol deviations or poor cooperation). There were 77 patients in the 0.018-inch slot group and 76 patients in the 0.022-inch slot group (overall mean age: 19.1 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the severity of the OIIRR nor patient perception of pain between the two study groups (P = 0.115 and P = 0.08 respectively). The correlation between the severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology or history of dental trauma was not statistically significant (P = 0.086 and P = 0.313). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between the severity of OIIRR and pain during treatment (R = 0.045, P = 0.617). Limitations It was impossible to blind clinicians or patients to allocation, and oral hygiene and periodontal outcomes were not assessed. Conclusions The effect of bracket slot size on the severity of OIIRR and patient perception of pain are not significant. Trial registration The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 March 2014, registration number: NCT02080338.</p

The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository

A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems:Part 3 - Biological side-effects of treatment

English

https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/27500320/Author_Accepted_Manuscript.pdf

A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems:part 3 - biological side-effects of treatment

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Dundee Online Publications

Crossref

The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository

University of Dundee Online Publications