Beresford-Dey, Marie

Holme, Richard

Professional Development in Education

As a result of the report Teaching Scotland’s Future, in 2013 the Scottish Government made available £1.7 million for projects that would facilitate an increase in Master’s-level learning for teachers. One of the projects involved teachers, from a single local authority in Scotland, undertaking a 30-credit module; a distinct element of this project was that participants had the choice to submit the assignment at Master’s level. Two group interviews were conducted with a non-probability volunteer sample taken from the total project group (n = 30). The two research groups comprised either students who submitted their assignment (n = 6) or those who chose not to submit (n = 6). The resulting data was then analysed, taking into account Evans conceptualised model of professionalism and professional development, to determine how attitudinal components relate to the participants’ decision about whether to submit their assessment decision. The study concludes by suggesting that a deeper understanding of the motivation of teachers is essential when planning such continuing professional development/professional learning programmes.</p

University of Dundee Online Publications

Optional assessment submission within Master’s-level learning:teachers’ perceptions

Marie Beresford-Dey

Richard Holme

Crossref

Optional assessment submission within Master’s-level learning: teachers’ perceptions

English

https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/17588467/Masters_level_learning_optional_submission_PDiE_May_2017_minor_alterations.pdf

Optional assessment submission within Master’s-level learning:teachers’ perceptions

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Dundee Online Publications

Crossref

University of Dundee Online Publications