The evolution of the geomagnetic field in the Iberian Peninsula during the first
millennium AD is still poorly constrained. In this study we report the archaeomagnetic
full vector obtained from one combustion structure, GS kiln, recovered from the
archaeological site La Genestosa (Salamanca, Spain). This archaeological site is located
near the Portugal-Spain border (40.352º N, 6.772º W). It has been dated by
archaeological evidences around the first century AD. A total 18 hand samples were
recovered from the archaeological site consisting in two different groups of materials:
tiles recycled to construct the sole furnace and typical burned clays. We present results
from 11 specimens investigated from 11 hand samples. Specimens belonging to the first
group (tiles) have relatively high values of natural remanent magnetization (NRM) and
susceptibility while the second group of specimens is characterized by significantly
lower values of NRM and susceptibility. The characteristic remanent manetization
(ChRM) is carried by a low coercivity magnetic phase with Curie temperatures of 257–
573 ºC, ranging from Ti-high titanomagnetite/titanomagnemite to Ti-poor
titanomagnetite/magnetite. Archaeointensity determinations were carried out by using
the classical Thellier-Thellier protocol including pTRM checks (partial-TRM) and
corrections for magnetic anisotropy. The effect of anisotropy of the thermoremanent
magnetization (ATRM) on paleointensity analysis was systematically investigated
although low ATRM corrections were obtained. Only 5 of the 11 samples have been
considered to calculate the mean intensity while the other 6 were rejected because they
did not accomplish the standard criteria of quality commonly used in paleointensity
studies. The mean intensity obtained was 68.6 ± 5.2 μT, corrected for ATRM. The
direction of the field at first century AD has also been determined from GS kiln (D =
0.78º; I = 55.4º; N = 11, α95 = 3.1°). The directional data agree with previous results
while the intensity obtained is slightly higher than the one expected for the first century
AD. However, it is important to notice that the mean intensity obtained is consistent
with previous results within the error margins and with palaeosecular variations curves
synthesize from regional models and with directional and palaeointensitiy data.Peer reviewe